E.Nagi Reddy v. The Government Of Telangana

[ 325s ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY. THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF IVIARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) NO: 5656 OF 2017 Between:

E.Nagi Reddy, S/o, E. Sambi Reddy, Aged about 49 years, working as Town Planning Officer, Hyderabad lrrletro Railways, Hyderabad, R/O, D.No.19-32/3/3 Kalyapuri, Uppal, Hyderabad.

...PETITIONER AND

1. The Government of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat Buildings, Secretariat, Hyderabad-500 022.

2. The Director of Town and Country Planning, Telangana, A-C.Guards, Lakidikapool Hyderabad-500 038.

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court mdy be pleased to call for the records leading to the issue of impugned charge memo, vide G.O.Rt.No.994 MA & UD (V2) Department daled 23-07-2003 issued by the 'l st respondent and set aside the same by holding it as is highly illegal arbitrary on the ground that delay in initiation and continuing the disciplinary Proceedings pursuant the said charge Memo, consequently direct the respondents to consider the case of the applicant for promotion to the post of Assistant Director of Town and Country Planning from the post of Town Planning Officer without reference to the charge memo, vide G.O.Rt.No.994 MA & UD (V2) Department dated 23-072003 issued by the '1 st respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. M.V.S. SAI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT The Court made the following: ORDER

HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) No.5656 OF 2017 ORDER:

Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition (TR) does not survive for further adjudication and the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents has fairly acceded to the same. 2.

Recording the submissions made by learned counsel appearing on either side, the Writ Petition (TR) is dismissed as infructuous.

3.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.

SD/.N.SRIHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR I //TRUE COPY// SECTI OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRl. M.V.S. SAI KUMAR Advocate [OPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP for Municipal Administration and Urban Development, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OU!

3. Two CD Copies CHR SB 89K II I I

HIGH COURT DATED:1410312023 --"a':- Jr''- C) .$ lU s*

ORDER

W.P.(TR).No.5656 of 2017 to u- \q# iT )1.

DrsMrssrNG THE WRIT PETTTTON (TR) AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS 91, z'