← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCC/2198/2012closed no costs

Mogilicharla Yadagiri , v. N. Bhagya

2023-12-14J Sreenivas Rao4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2198 OF 2012 Contempt case filed under Sections 10 to 1 2 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the respondent herein for deliberately and willfully violating the orders dated 13-08-2012 passed in W.P. No. 24793 of 2012 of this Hon'ble High Court.

Between:

Mogilicharla Yadagiri, S/o. Late Appaiah, Aged about 73 years Rl/o. H. No.2-2221 7 O, Gopalapuram, Maha bubabad, Warangal District ...PETITIONER/PETITIONER AND N. Bhagya, Wo Not Known, Aged about 45 years, The Tahsildar, Mahabubabad Mandal, Warangal District.

...RESPONDENT.

Counsel for lhe Petitioner : SRl. M VENKANNA, Advocate Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER:

L

I{ON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO CONTEM PT CASE No.219 8 of 2Ol2 ORDER:

This Contempt Case is filed by invoking the provisions under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents for non-implementation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.24793 of 2Ol2,dated 13.O8.2O12. 2.

When the matter was taken up for hearing on I I I I 07.12.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. To give on opportunity, the matter was posted to O4.n.2O23. On O8.12.2023 also there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. To give a final opportunity, the matter is posted to 14.12.2023 under the caption "For Dismissal'. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner inspite of listing the matter under the caption "For Dismissal."

3.

Counter aflidavit is filed by the respondent - Tahsildar, wherein it stated that pursuant to the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.24793 of 2012, dared 13.Og.2012, the respondents considered the application submitted bv the petitioner and issued notice on 09.O1.2Of 3.

I

r\ In view of the above, no further adjudication is required.

5.

Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. However, the petitioner is granted liberty to ava the remedies as available under law.

pending miscellaneous stand closed.

petitions, if any, shall STY.K. SAILESHI DEPUTY REGISTRAR I //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. N.. Bhagya, W/o Not Known, Aged about 45 years, The Tahsildar, ^ Mahabubabad Mandal, Warangal District.

2. One CC to SRt. M.VENKANNA, Advocate tOpUCl

3. Two CCs ro Gp FOR REVENUE, Hbhtor;afoiilL state of Tetangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

4. Two CD copies.

MY Prv,

\ HIGH COURT DATED:1411212023 -li'."

I ^ -".

..-:'- / r,')"

/:;

' !: ','

\, ii ei, .ail .,,\ /,/ *.i 2 0 FEB 2|I/4 \,.. 4.r, \.+ _\:_;,

ORDER

CC.No.2198 ot 2012 cc ts cLosED.

S{Cl rz\z(c-tr'