Punnam Srinivas, Karimnagar Dist. v. P.P., Hyd And Ano

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERBAD WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 15933 OF 2014 Between:

Punnam Srinivas, S/o. Odeulu, Occ Nil, R/o. Sambaiahpally Village, Sulthanabad Mandal, Karimnagar Distrlct ...PETTTTONER/ACCUSED(S) AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad 2 Duddela Ravi, S/o. Jaggaiah, Occ Private Employee, R/o. H No. 84-65712, Hanumannagar Locality, Karimnagar Town, Karimnagar district ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS Petition under Section 482 o'f Cr.P.C praying that rn the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petrtion, the High Court may be pleased to qua'sh the proceedings in C.C No.154712013 on the file of the Court of the Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Karimnagar against the petitioner / accused and pass l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(CRLPMP . NO: '17066 OF 2014) Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petrtion, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings rn C C No.

1547 of 2013 on the file of Additional Judicial First class Magistrate. Karimanagar including appearance of the petitioner in the said case, pending disposal of the Quash petition, and pass This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri S.

Assistant Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No. 2.

The Court made the following: ORDER

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL PETITION No.15933 of 2o14 ORDER:

None appears for the petitioner. Even on the previous dates of hearing i.e., on 02.12.2022, 02.11.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Today, though the matter was listed under the caption 'For Dismissal', none appeared for the petitioner.

2.

Thus, it appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter vigilantly and diligently any more, therefore, this criminal petition is liable to be dismissed for nonprosecution. 3.

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State is present.

4.

Accordingly, this criminal petition is dismissed lor nonprosecutlon. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shzrll stand closed SD/. L. SIVA PARVATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// i !

SECTION OFFICER To, 1 The Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate' Karimnagar

2. One CC to Sri S. Srinivasa Sharma, Advocate [OPUCI

3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High court for the state of Telangana, Hyderabad [OUT] 4 Two CD Copies

HIGH COURT DATED: O8l'1112023 E STAT€ I ( q o t I ?t3 2[2[ oo t DI:s PA:TC

ORDER

CRLP.No.15933 ot 2014 DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION I I