Smt. Gandhi Radha Alias Garige Radha v. Kaparveni Srinivas

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGAT{A

AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAYOF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1874 OF 2021 Petition under Article 227 oC lhe Constitution of lndia, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to allow the Civil Revision Petition by setting aslde the order dt.ol-10-2021 passed by the XIX Junior Civil Judge Gourt, City Civil Court at Hyderabad, in I ANo. 167 ot 2O21 in O.S.No.2586 of 2021. Between:

Smt. Gandhi Radha alias Garige Radha, Wo. Late G.Raju, aged about 42 years, Occ. House maid servanUtailorihg, Fl/o.H.No.2-2-10931811, Golnaka, Venkateshwar Nagar, Hyderabad.

'-*"''"il%.3."i'l3li'Jt"lt"ltliT AND

1. Kaparveni Srinivas, S/o.Late Ashaiah aged about 36 years, Oq]. Auto rickshaw Driver, R/o.H.No.2-2-73418/43, Shankarnagar, 6 No.Chowrasta, Hyderabad.

2. Kaparveni Pavan Kumar, S/o, K.Srinivas, Ag{ about 20 y.ears, Occ.. Student' FVdt.H.No.2-2-734lB/43, Shankarnagar, 6 No. Chowrasta, Hyderabad. .,.RespondenUDefendants in O.S.No.2586 of 2021 lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order of attachment before the Judgment of auto rickshaw bearing vehicle no.TS10 UB 0868 belonging to the respondent no.1/defendant no.1 for recovery of Rs.40,0001- (Forty thousand only) as well as suit bearing O.S.No.2586 of 2021 pending before the XIX Junior Civil Judge Court, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, and expenses pending disposal of the Revision Petitioner/suit and pass

Counsel for the Petitioner(s): Sri. Bankatlal Mandhani Counsel forthe Respondents: None appeared The Court made the following: ORDER

r) THT IION'BLE.SRI JuSTICE NARSING RAO NANDII(ONDA - CIVIL REVISION PEIITION No.1874 of 2O21'z ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that cause in the present revision petition does not survive for adjudication and the same has become infructuous

2. Recording the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, this revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if ar,ry, shall Sd,. L. LAI(SHMI BABU ASSISTAT.IT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY'/ / SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The XIX Junior civil Judge court, city Givil court, Hyderabad

2. One CC to Sri. Bankatlal Mandhani, Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CD CoPies vf n /PR

HIGH COURT DATED:1811112025 ( TTIE S ,f,o a.

CRP.No.1874 ot 2021 *

ORDER

1 3 llli8 2026 * liTC DISMISSING OF THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS.

€ o-\ &