Dr. Ande Krishna Murthy Md (Gen Med) v. Government Of Andhra Pradesh
[ 325s ] HtGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR)NO: 296 OF 2017 Between:
1. Dr. Ande Krishna Murthy MD (Gen Med), Aged about 55 years, S/o. Late Ande Sesha Das, Occ: Professor of General Medicine, Andhra Medical College/King George Hospital, Vishakapatnam. R/o. D.NO.14-38-1A, Flat no.402 viswanath Residency, Muppidi colony St. Maharani pet, Visakhapatnam. 530002
2. Dr.S.Manohar I\4 D (Gen Med) ,Aged about 56 years,S/o. Sri Late S. Ramachandram, Occ: Professor of General Medicine, Osmania lVledical CollegeJOsmania General Hospital, Hyderabad, R/o.203 Legend Satyam, 2-220/ A,DD colony, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER AND 1.
Government of Andhra Pradesh, Health, Medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad rep by its Principal Seiretary to Government. 50000'l
2. The Director of l\4edical Education, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 500001 ,.RESPONDENTSWP Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to review all promotions made after 29.3.1988 to the posts of Associate Professor of STD, Professor of General Medicine in terms of GO Ms No.325 dated 15.6.1999 and in terms of Hon'ble Supreme court Judgenient rendered on 19.'10.2010 in Challa Jayabhaskar and others Vs Thungathurti Surender and others reported in (2010) 13 SCC 348 and consequently direct the respondents to promote the applicants as Professor of
I I General Medicine at least with effect from 1997 on par with the juniors who were so promoted with all consequential benefits like retrospective promotion, arrears of salary senioritY etc.
Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. K. LAKSHMI NARASIMHA Counsel for the Respondents: GP For SERVICES The Court made the following: ORDER ,t
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) No. 296 OF 2017 ORDER:
Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the subject matter of this petition has become infructuous by efflux of time and no further orders are required in this Petition. 2.
In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Writ Petition (TR) is dismissed as infructuous. 3.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to cost.
SD/- P.PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTA ,TRUE COPY// SEC I \ To,
1. One CC to Sri K' Lakshmi Narasimha' Advocate IOPUCI
2. fwoCCs to GP Services' High Court for the State of Telangana' [OUT]
3. Two CD CoPies */ t TJ GJ I
HIGH COURT DATED: 07|1212022 t .r * *.
-=..:s, ') ,- t!.
, \ *
ORDER
!r, WP(TR).No.296 of 2017 DrsMrsslNG THE WRIT PETlrloN (TR) AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
CA@1 @ '\9-'