Smt. Santosh Varma v. The Greater Municipal Corporation Of Hyderabad,Rep. By

133771 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO: 27I OF 2010 writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters patent filed against the order dated 1.12.2009 and made in wP.No.14077 of 2007 and pass on the file of the High court. Between:

Smt. Santosh Varma, W/o. R.K. Varma Housewife, R:/o. Rajouri Gardens, Block 50 New Delhi-1 10 027, Rep. by her GpA Holder Sri G.V. Rama Krishna Rao, S/o. G.L.Narasimha Rao, aged 66 yrs, Occ: Retired Officer,PUo. 12-13241 , Street No.15, Tarnaka, Secunderabad-7. ...APPELLANT/ PETITIONER AND

1. The Greater Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Rep. by, its Commissioner, at Secunderabad (North Zone), Secunderabad.

2. Rabia Asif Mirza, W/o. Late Asif Miza, Aged about 70 years, Occ: Housewife, H.No. 1-86, Habsiguda, Ranga Reddy District.

..,RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS I.A. NO: 1 OF 2010(WAMP. NO: 636 OF 2010) Petltion under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Building Plan sanctioned in Proceedings No.D/.BA/369/2006 dated 11.4.2OO7 issued by the 1st respondent in favour of the 2nd respondent pending disposal of the above writ appeal.

LA. NO: 1 OF 2013(W AM P. NO: 1327 OF 2013) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit Smt. Rekha Keshap, Sri R.K.Verma, Akhilesh Keshap and Rahul Keshap to come on record in W.A.No.279l2010 as Appellants 21o 5 being the Legal Representatives of the original deceased Appellant, rep. by Sri G.V.Ramakrishna Rao as their G.P.A. Holder.

Counsel for the Appellant: SRI SUMAN FOR SRI SRINIVAS POLAVARAPU Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI M.DURGA PRASAD, SC FOR GHMC Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI A.RAVINDER REODY The Court made the following: JUDGMENT

THE HON,BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR t l WRIT APPEALNo.279 of 2O1O JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Alok Aradhe) Mr. Suman, learned counsel representing Mr. Srinivas Polavarapu, learned counsel for the appellant. Mr. M.Durga Prasad, iearned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC) for respondent No. 1.

2.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that on account of efflux of time, the issue involved in this appeal which essentially pertains to validity of building permission does not survive for consideration. 3.

In view of aforesaid submission, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

SD/-M. RAMANA KRISHNA DEPUU REGISTRAR C& SECTION OFFICER To //TRUE COPY//

1. One CC to SRI SRINIVAS POLAVARAPU, Advocate [OPUC]

2. One CC to SRI M.DURGA PRASAD, SC FOR GHMC [OPUC]

3. One CC to SRI A.RAVINDER REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD Copies PSK GJP

HIGH COURT DATED:1 211012023 ,; ar4].A

JUDGMENT

c.

(),+ <('

+) WA.No.279 of 2010 C.) i.) 0 6 ll0r/ ?[23 ; r I .lj - "ii:-t'{;.''.

- -*--::-.--- i'- DISMISSING THE WRIT APPEAL AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.

lpD