L.Shiva Lingam, v. The State Of Telangana,

\''

[ 33181 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSANO AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUST]CE ABH]NAND KUMAR SHAVILI , AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO REV.!A.NO.1 0F 2023 ]N WRIT PETITION NO:36973 oF 20't4 Between:

L.Shiva Linqam, S/o. L.Yadamallaiah, aged About 47 years, Unemployee, Rtio. H.No.-2-7-2lA, Street No. 3, Kakatiya Nagar, Habsiguda' Uppal' Rangareddy District'

...pETrroNER AND

1. The State of Telangana, represented by lts Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Director df School Education, Govt. of Telangana, Hyderabad.

3. The District Educational Officer, and Convenor, D.S.C. 2008, Hyderabad.

4. The District Collector & Chairman, DSC 2008, Hyderabad. ...RESPoNDENTS Petition under order 47 Rule I of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to review the order in WP No.36973 ot 2014 daled 2911112O22. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and Merylorandum of Grounds filed in support thereof and upon reading the Order dt: 29.11.2022 in W.P.No.36973 of 2014 and upon hearing the arguments of Sri KATA ARVIND KUMAR, Counsel appearing on behalf the Review Petitioner and of GP for School Education on behalf of the Respondehts the Court made the following: ORDER

/ "This Review application is filed to review the order, dated 29.11.2022 passed by this court in W.P.No.36973 ol 2O14. Heard both the parties.

Learned counsel for the review petitioner had contended that the review petitioner is qualified to be appointed as Physical Education Teacher (pET). The subject writ petition filed by the p€titioner was disposed of along with the batch of cases and in the operative portion, there was no discussion raised in respect of PETs. Therefore, the learned counsel appearing for the review petitioner had contended that let appropriate orders be passed in the review petition by directing the State Government to consider the case of pETs. On the other hand, learned Government pleader appearing for the respondents had contended that appropriate orders can be passed. I This Court, having considered the rival submissions made by both the parties, is of the view that the Review Petition can be disposed of directing the State Government to consider the case of PETs also while filling up the vacancies, if the petitioner is coming within the zone of consideration. With the above said observations/ directions, this Review application is disposed of."

ASS'S?l0rvi?3,t+iiR //rRUE CoPY// s/.,- SECTION OFFICER . The Principal Secrelqry: School Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of Telangana.

. The Director of School Edutation, Govt. of Telangana, Hyderabad. . The District Educational Officer, and Convenor, O'.S.C. Z6OA, Hyderabad. . The District Collector & Chairman, DSC 2008, Hvderabad. ' . The_ Section Officer, Service Section, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad.

. The. Section Officer, Posting Section, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad.

. One CC to SRI KATA ARVTND KUMAR, Advocate tOpUCl . Two CCs to GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION, Hish'Courtior the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] . Two CD Copies To I PSK.

KKS s

I tI , CC TODAY HIGH COURT DATED:04/0412024

ORDER

REV.!A.No.1 OF 2023 IN WP.No.36973 of 2014 o\?- T tlE Sj l-4iA ',?

1 E APR 2U2t l) * -l cF i.'pr r:vtC9 .-. - :r'

DISPOSING OF THE REVIEW IA WITHOUT COSTS.

$