High Court for State of TelanganaWP/34125/2022disposed of no costs

T. Sarat Babu v. The State Of Telangana And 3 Others

2022-09-02Mummineni Sudheer Kumar3 pages

3256 I HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR l.A.NO.4 0F 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO: 34125 OF 2022 Between:

T. Sarat Babu, S/o. T. Satyanarayana Rao' Aged about 82 . years, F/o. 8-3-979/1 to 6, Flat No.3078, Vishnu Splendar Apartment, Yellareddyguda, Hyderabad.

.,.PETITIONER AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by Principal Secretary, Revenue (Urban Land Ceiling) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Hyderabad District at Hyderabad.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Secunderabad Division, Hyderabad.

4. The Tahsildar, Shaikpet Mandal, Shaikpet, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to post the present lnterlocutory Application before his Lordship justice Mommineni Sudheer Kumar for passing a clarificatory order in wP No. 34125 of 2022 daled 2.9.2022 for reference of G.O.Ms.No. 215 dated 4.10.2016 in the operative portion of the judgement with a direction to the respondents not to insist upon the establishment of link of my sale deed with the title of the original declaring in respect of the land admeasuring 460 sq.yards in premises no.8'2-6771A1111' Road No. 12 Banjara Hills, Hyderabad and thereby not t take into account clause "10@ of G.O.Ms.No.92 dated 26.5.20'16 for consideration and grant of my

application /regularisation dated 8.1 2.2021 and pass orders within 2 weeks subject to payment of the prescribed amount.

This petition coming on for hearing upon perusing the petition and affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Vedula Venkataramana, Senior Counsel for Ms. Chintalapudi Lakshmi Kumari, Counsel for the petitioner and of GP for Revenue on behalf of the Respondents, the Court made the following: ORDER "For the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the accompanying application, the application is ordered." SD/.R.KARTHIKEYAN ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// / ( To sEcTtoN oFFtcER

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue (Urban Land Ceiling) Department, Secretariat, State of Telangana at Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Hyderabad District at Hyderabad.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Secunderabad Division, Hyderabad.

4. The Tahsildar, Shaikpet Mandal, Shaikpet, Hyderabad.

5. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

6. One CC to M/S.CHINTALAPUDI LAKSHMI KUIUARI, Advocate IOPUCI

7. Two CD Copies B. One spare copy S.A BS ;- (j'

HIGH COURT DATED:2811212022 fe.

S :).

ORDER

r< J I.P 0 5 JAt{ 2m3 ll ,-t I.A.NO.4 0F 2022 IN WP.No.34125 of 2022 C, \ *r, t.

S1.I,1q";?

ORDERING THE IA z)