E.Ashok, Chittoor District v. The Acharya Ng Ranga Agricultural University, Hyderabad

[ 32es I HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION NO: 22447 OF 2007 Between:

E.Ashok, S/o. Late E. Radhakrishnama Naidu, Age{ about ^35 years, Occ: Lrnioi AssiitaniCum Typist S.V.Agricultural Colleg-e, Tirupati Chittoor district ...PETITIONER AND The Acha rep. by its rya NG Ranga Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Registrar ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the respondent in not considering the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of senior Assistant even though he is fully qualified and eligible for promotion as illegal, arbitrary, and consequently direct the respondent to consider the case of the petitioner. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CHAKRAVARTHY FOR SRI O' MANOHAR REDDY Counsel forthe Respondents: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL W.P.No.22447 of 2OO7 ORDER:

This Writ petition is fiIed in the year 2O07 seeking this Court intervention to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate direction declaring the action of the respondent in not considering the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Senior Assistant even though he is fully qualified and eiigible for promotion as illegal, arbitrary and to consequently direct the respondent to consider the case of the petitioner.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this Court had granted interim orders in WpMp.No.29 154 of 2OO7, dated 23.1O.2OO7, to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Senior Assistant I I I t along with aii other eligible candidates as per their eligibility and as per law.

3.

Learned Counsel, Mr.Chakravarthy representing on behalf of learned counsel on record Mr.O.Manohar Reddy, submits that interim orders on 23.1O.2OO7 in

WPMP.No.291 54 of 2OO7 are complied and in spite of the efforts made to contact the writ petitioner' the writ petitioner is not available or responding and submits that the writ petitioner may have been promoted as per seniority as a matter of consequential benefits' 5.

No representation on behalf of the respondents' 6.

This Court is not inclined to go into the merits or facts of the case, in view of the compliance of interim order granted by this Court, no further orders are necessary' The writ petition is disposed of accordingly' There shall be no order as to costs'

7 .

Miscellaneous petitions' if any' pending in this writ petition, shall also stand disposed of'

SD/-C. PRAVEE KUMAR //TRUE COPY// ASSlsrANtt tsT I SECTION OFFICER To, istrar, Acharya NG Ranga Agricultural University' Rajendranagar'

1. The Reg HYderab

2. One CC ad.

to SRI O. MANOHAR REDDY' Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CD CoPies KKS BS BSK

HIGH COURT DATED:1611112022 TA rF il ( o + 2 5 JAll ?M3 t, a :.j\

ORDER

WP.No.22447 ot 2A07 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 't9 \2 gsq-