Satyanarayana v. The State Of A.P
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENry NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO :PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN r.A.NO.1 0F 2022 IN CRL.P. No.10731of 2016 Between:
Smt. Kiran Kishore Singh, W/o Kishore Singh Aditya Singh, S/o Kishore Singh.
Petitioners/Petitioners (Petitioners in Crl.P.No.10731 of 20t6 on the file of the High Court) AND
1. Miss Roopa Bajaj, D/o Praveen Kumar Bajaj, Occ: Employee, R/o H.No.6-31177 /7 / 7, Kundanbagh, Begumpet, Hyderabad.
2. The State of Telangana, rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh. Respondents/Respondents (Respondents in -do-) Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim stay granted in Crl.P.No.1073l of 2016 dated 9.7L.202L, in the interest of justice;
CRL.P.No.1073L / 2OL6 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against the petitioners in S.C. No.215 of 2016 on the file of V Metropolitan Sessions ludge, at Hyderabad, in the interest of justice;
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and memorandum of grounds filed herein, order of the High Court dated 25-7-2016 made in Crl.P.No.1073 L of 20L6, and order dated 08-09-2016 made in Crl.P.M.P. No. 15043 of 2016 and order dated 26-03-2019 made in IA.No.2 of 2019 and order dated 06-08-2019 made in IA.NO.3 of 2019 and order dated 0901-2020 made in IA.No.1 of 2020 and order dated 23.02.202L made in IA.No.1 ot 2021 and order dated 9.11.2021 made in CRP.no.09.7l.202L made in Crl.P.No,10731 of 2016 herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. T.Pradyumna Kumar Reddy Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor (TG) for the Respondent No.2, the Court made the following
ORDER:
Notice sent to the respondent No,2 is returned as respondent No.2 'not claimed', Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the Additional Public Prosecutor.
Orders reserved.
Interim orders granted earlier are extended till disposal of the Crimina! Petition.
Sd/- K.AMMAJI ASSISTANf RreISTRAR *("':j //TRUE COPY// S OFFiCER To
1. The V Metropolitan Sessions Judge, at Hyderabad.
2. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor (TG), High Court at Hyderabad (OUT)
3. One CC to Sri. T. Pradyumna Kumar Reddy, Advocate, IOPUC]
4. One spare copy
HIGH COURT DR.DNR.J DATED: 29.O4.2O22 r.A.NO.1 0F 2022 IN cRL.P.NO.1073t OF 2016 , t;'. | ;a tt N$ilm EXTENSION OF INTERIM ORDER t.