K.Nageswara Sarma , Sarma, Hyd v. State Of Ts., Rep. By P.P. And Another

IN THE HIGH GOURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1465 OF 2017 Between:

K.Nageswara Sarma @ Sarma, S/o.Late Madhava Sastry, Aged about 49 years, Occ: Business, R/o.Plot No.55, Flat No.2, Vaishnavi Apartments, Lalitha Nagar, Ramnagar Gundu, Hyderabad.

...Petitioner/Accused No.1

AND State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad ...RespondenUComPlainant

2. K.Radha Krishnan, S/ o.Late Subramanyam, Aged about 67 years, Occ : Retd. Employee, Rl/o.H.No. 17- l-39'l lS I 417, Singareni Colony, Saidabad, Hyderabad.

...RespondenUDefact Complainant Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of GroLhds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in crime No. 21 5 of 2015 on the file of C.C.S,, Hyderabad against the petitioners herein CRL.P.M.P. NO: 1445 OF 2017 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the lVlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in Crime No.215 of 2015 on the file of C.C.S., Hyderabad including the appearance of the petitioners during the pendency of the above Criminal Petition.

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri G. VASANTHA RAYUDU, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri N.V.ANANTHA KRISHNA, Advocate for the Respondent No.2 The Court made the following: ORDER

HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITION No.1465 OE 2017 ORDER:

Seeking the Court to quash the proceedings that are pending against the petitioner in Crime No.215 of 2015 of Central Crime Station, Hyderabad, the present Criminal Petition is filed.

2.

No representation on petitioner,s side on cal1. 3.

On the other hand, learned Additional public Prosecutor, on written instructions, submits that charge sheet is filed by the Police concerned and therefore, the Criminal Petition has become infructuous.

4.

Recording the said submission, the Criminal petition is dismissed granting liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh petition in case the cause survives.

5.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

Sd/-T.JAYASREE //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANTAtsISTRAR I +fi"=- To, sEcTtoN oFFtcER

1. The Xll Additional Chief tvletropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad. 2- The Station House Officer, Central Crime Station, Hyierabad District.

3. Two ccs to the Pubric prosecutor, High court for the state of rerangana at Hyderabad.(OUT)

4. One CC to SRt. G VASANTHA RAYUDU, Advocate tOpUCl

5. One CC to SRt. N. V ANANTHA KR|SHNA, Advocate tOpU-Cl 6- Two CD Copies.

t.-AM plp *\.V

HIGH COURT DATED:1511212022 ! ,.\ ; L ,f 1? lit" ilt .' :i

ORDER

CRLP.No.1465 of 2017 THE CRIMINAL PT]TI'I'ION IS DIS}IISSED @xG