Ravella Kamala, W/O Suresh v. The State Of Telangana,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH ******** WRIT PETITION NO.23308 of 2015 Between :

Ravella Kamala W/o.Suresh, Age 48 yrs, Occu : Govt. Employee, R/o.H.No.5-222, 8th Line, Srinagar Colony, Gollagudem Division, Khammam, Khammam District.

.. Petitioner and The State of Telangana, Rep., by its Principal Secretary (Municipal Admn. &GAD), Secretariat, Hyderabad & others.

.. Respondents DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED : 29.07.2015 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers : Yes / No may be allowed to see the Judgments ?

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be : Yes / No marked to Law Reporters/Journals

3. Whether Their Lordship wish to : Yes / No see the fair copy of the Judgment ?

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.23308 of 2015 ORDER :

The petitioner claims to be the owner of house No.5-222, 8th line, Srinagar Colony, Gollagudem Division, Khammam, Khammam District. The petitioner alleges that the 3rd respondent obtained building permission for construction of G+3 floors on 17.01.2009 from the Gram Panchayat, Khanpur Haveli, which is now merged into the Municipal Corporation. In deviation of the sanctioned plan, and without leaving space for parking, the entire ground floor is constructed. Alleging illegal constructions made by the 3rd respondent, the petitioner claims to have submitted several representations starting from the year 2011 and so far the said representations are not acted upon. The latest representation submitted by the petitioner is dated 22.08.2014 addressed to the Commissioner, Khammam Municipal Corporation.

2. Since the representations submitted by the petitioner are pending consideration with the Municipal Corporation, the Writ Petition is disposed of without expressing any opinion on merits, directing the respondentCorporation to consider the representations of the petitioner, alleging illegal constructions made by the 3rd respondent and pass appropriate orders as warranted by law. The respondent-Corporation shall cause notice on the 3rd respondent and give due opportunity to the 3rd respondent before taking appropriate course of action as warranted by law. The said exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.

__________________ P.NAVEEN RAO,J 29th July, 2015.

Rds