Akkinapalli Ravinder , Ravi v. The State Of Telangana

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO WP. No.23583 of 2018 O R D E R:

Heard counsel for petitioner, the Government Pleader for Civil Supplies appearing for respondents 1 to 4, and the Government Pleader for Home appearing for 5th respondent. 2.

Counsel on both sides state that the issue in the Writ Petition is covered by the order dt.01.05.2018 in W.P.No.16082 of 2018.

3.

Therefore, for reasons alike, this Writ Petition is also disposed of directing the respondents to complete 6-A proceedings initiated against the petitioner herein, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and pending enquiry, the stocks and the subject vehicle seized from the petitioner may not be sold and if the petitioner offers to furnish immovable property security, the respondents may consider for releasing the stocks and the subject vehicle to the petitioner on his furnishing immovable property security for the value of the seized stocks and the subject vehicle. No order as to costs.

4.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand dismissed.

_____________________________ M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J 10th July, 2018.

gra