Gownolla Devamma, v. B. Venkatramana,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR CIVIL REVISOIN PETITION No.4271 of 2017 ORDER:

This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, came to be filed assailing the order dated 13.06.2017 passed in I.A.No.466 of 2015 in O.S.No.723 of 2007 by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Madanapalle, whereby and whereunder the application filed by the petitioners under Order XVI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure was dismissed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. Since this Court is not passing any orders against the respondents, there is no necessity to issue notice to them and the revision is disposed of at the stage of admission itself.

At the time of arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the certified copies of the documents, which are now sought to be summoned, were already marked as exhibits in the suit. He only wants a witness to be summoned to prove the contents of the documents. But, the same was not the request of the petitioners before the Court below. For better adjudication, the request of the petitioners made before the Court is extracted hereunder: " Under the above circumstances, it is therefore most humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to Order for cause production of documents that are described in the petition, by the office of Tahasildar, Madanapalle, by deposing evidence, or otherwise much hardship and loss will be caused to us."

Having regard to the above, I see no merit in the revision petition. However, it is always open to the petitioners to make an appropriate application before the Court below ventilating their

grievance, in which event, the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law.

Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions pending in this revision, if any, shall stand closed. No costs.

_______________________________ JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR 24.08.2017 Note : Issue C.C. by 29.08.2017 B/o.

sur