Morampudi Krishnaiah, v. The State Of Telangana

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.19205 OF 2017 ORDER:

This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, came to be filed questioning the inaction of the 1st respondent in passing appropriate orders either on the stay petition or on the revision filed on 19.08.2016 by the petitioners against the order dated 06.08.2016 passed by the 2nd respondent in CMA No.1/2008, as illegal and arbitrary.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Social Welfare. With their consent, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission itself. Since this Court is not going into the merits of the case, there is no necessity to issue notice to unofficial respondent. Though various grounds are raised in the writ petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner restricts his prayer seeking a direction to the 1st respondent to dispose of the revision filed by the petitioner at the earliest and till such time the status quo may directed to be maintained.

The same is not seriously disputed by the learned AGP. It is to be noted that earlier petitioners herein filed W.P.No.37125 of 2016, which was disposed of by this Court on 08.11.2016 setting aside the order passed by the revisional authority rejecting the stay application on the ground that the petitioners herein were not heard before dismissal of the stay application. Further, the 1st respondent herein was directed to give notice to the petitioners and also to hear them before passing orders in revision.

Now, the grievance of the petitioners is that the 4th respondent is trying to evict the petitioners from the subject land without concluding the revision proceedings.

Having regard to the rival submissions made and as the revision is pending since August, 2016, the 1st respondent is directed to dispose of the revision filed by the petitioner against the orders of the 2nd respondent, as early as possible preferably, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Taking into consideration the facts in issue, status quo as on today is directed to be maintained by the parties till disposal of the revision by the 1st respondent.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions pending in this writ petition, if any, shall stand closed. No costs.

________________________ C. PRAVEEN KUMAR, J 14.06.2017 sur