← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/34367/2022withdrawn

T.Srikanth Reddy v. Osmania University

2022-12-19K.Lakshman3 pages

[ 3168 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry TWO :PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 34367 OF 2022 Between:

T.Srikanth Reddy, S/o T. Narsi Reddy, Occ. Student, r/o H.No. 1'l-8-33 Huda Employees Colony, Kothapet, Hyderabad.

...Petitioner

AND 1.

2.

J.

4.

Osmania University, rep. by its Registrar, OU Campus, Tamaka Hyderabad. The Vice-Chancellor, Osmania University, Hyderabad. The Controller of Examinations, Osmania University, Hyderabad. Mahatma Gandhi Law College, rep. by lts Principal, beside Ranga Reddy District Court, NTR Nagar, L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not allowing the petitioner herein to attend the 4th semester classes of three years LL.B. course on the ground of non-payment of Examination fee of 3rd semester inspite of the written representation s dl. 17 -8-2022 informing about the reasons for non-payment of the examination fee of 3rd semester, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and against to the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent authorities to permit the petitioner to attend the 4th semester classes and the subsequent examinations.

lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to consider and pass orders on the representation dt- 17 -8-2022.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. DONTIREDDY SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: SRI CH JAGANADHA RAO The Court made the following: ORDER

---*------- IION'BI-I.] SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN \\'RIl'PETITION No.34367 of 2022 ORDER:

Leamecl counsel for the petitioner submitted a letter dated 16.12.2022 to the Registrar (Judicial-l), stating that the matter has amicably settled outside the Cou(.

Considering thc said fact, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed SD/-A.V.S.

ASSISTANT //TRUE COPY// TRAR l SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRl. DONTIREDDY SRINIVASA REDDY Advocate [OPUC] i. o;; cc to snr. cH JAGANADHA RAo, Advocate [oPUC]

3. Two CD CoPies

HIGH COt'RT KL.J DATED:1911212022 it,;

!-l"ffi;l ,\\ '\\ a,1 uJ l:

:t rr oi (,/ ".s .\ Qq F\!

!

!

i .,,.\.'1t t:iQo .\\ o'

Ii

ORDER

a i i WP.No.34367 of 2022 i WRIT PETITION IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COST