Kandi Anil Kumar, v. State Of Telangana, Rep By Its Spl. Dy Collector, Lao,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY THE TWENTYSECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN Between:

Kandi Anil Kumar ... Petitioner V/s.

State of Telangana Represented by its Special Dy.Collector, LAO, Hyderabad Metro Rail, GHMC Hyderabad & Anr. ... Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri Kirti Lakshman Rao Counsel for the Respondents : GP for Land Acquisition [TG] Sri K.Vivek Reddy The court made the following : [order follows] O R D E R :

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri K.Vivek Reddy representing first and second respondents.

2. Sri K.Vivek Reddy, learned standing counsel submits that the respondents require little more time to pay compensation to the petitioner and consideration of petitioner's case as directed through order dated 09/04/2015. The learned counsel on instructions would further submit that in the case on hand, the

respondents either demolish or dispossess the subject matter of the writ petition only after paying compensation to the petitioner and on being compliant with section 38 of Act 30 of 2013.

3. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel, this court is of the view that the writ petition can be disposed of by placing on record the stand of the learned counsel.

4. The writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

5. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.

________________ JUSTICE S.V. BHATT.

22/04/2015 I s L

Circulation No.

Date: 22/04/2015 Court Master: I s L Computer No.43