A. Dasaradha Ramarao And ANR v. The Union Of India,Rep.By Gm, Sec\Bad.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P NAVEEN RAO AND THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI CIVIL MISCELLAN EOUS APPEAL NO: 4666 OF 2003 Appeal under Section 23 of Railway Claims Tribunal Act, against the Judgment in OAA No.l04 of 2003 daled 1111112O03 on the file of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Secunderabad Bench at Secunderabad. Between:
1. A. Dasaradha Ramarao, S/o. A. Perraju
2. A. Saraswathi, Wo. A. Dasaradha Ramarao ...APPELLANTS/ APPLICANTS AND The Union of lndia, Rep. by the General Manager, South Central Railway, Rail Nilayam, at Secunderabad.
...RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT For the Appellants : SRI K.S.N.MURTHY, Advocate (not present) For the Respondent : SMT ANJALT AGARWAL, Advocate I !
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT I
ION'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN FY,CI AND H{ N'BLE SMT DR.JUSTICE G.RADH.A IIANI , CwII IIISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.466t, : li 2OO3 I JUDGMENT: lPer on'ble Sn Justice P.Naueen Rao) I I no representation on behalf of the appellants on There was /e one opporfunit5r, the matter was <lirected to be listed 30.06.2022. To g ption 'for dismissal'.
today under the c even though the matter is listed un jer the caption 'for Today also.
no representation on behalfof the a1>petlants. dismissal', there ir Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is d srnissed for nonHence the prosecution. Pen ing miscellaneous petitions, if any, sh:rll stand closed. I S:r/.K.SRINIVASA RAO .JorNr +GlsrRAR l-l):-'"-- l //TRUE COPYii I]ECTION OFFICER To The Railway )lams Tribunal, Secunderabad Bench, ral {ie':underabad' (with reco rd s )
2. One CC to S i K.S.N'lvturthy, Advocate [OPUC] e. On" CC to S nt Anjali Agarwat, Advocate IOPUC]
4. Two CD Cog es
5. One Spare ( IPY s{x Kj
HIGH COURT DATED:0710712O 2 l !i., li.- \ri \,:
JUDGMENT
\J CMA.No.4666 of 1003 / DISMISSING FOI NON.PROSECUTION CMA.
Q'rK'