R. Srinivas Yadav v. The Commissioner

[ 32ss ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) NO: 1694 OF 2017 Between:

R. Srinivas yadav, S/o. Late R.Satyanarayana, Aged about 43 years, Town Planning Supervisor, Circle No. lV, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Sardar Mahal, Hyderabad, Fyo. 2-1-465, Nallakunta, Skeet No.6, Hyderabad. ...APPLICANT AND The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad. Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad -500022.

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records relating to the impugned Charge Memo., bearing No. 2709/DC/C4IAC(A/OP3/GHMC|2014-28, dated 29.01.2014 issued by the lst respondent and quash at'set-aside the same by declaring it as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to the material on record and violative of Articles 1 4, 16 and 21 of the Constitution and consequently direct the respondents to drop the disciplinary case against the applicant and grant all other service and monetary benefits including promotion to the post of Assistant City Planner. Counsel for the Applicant: SRI POODATTU AMARENDER Counsel for the Respondents: MR L. DAYAKAR REDDY SC FOR GHMC The Court made the following: ORDER

HONOURATJLE SIII IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR l\II(lT I,ETITION (TR) No. 1694 Ot:20L7 ORI)I]R:

Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the then Andhra Pradesh Adminlstrative Tribunal, Hyderabad by orCer dated 24.O2.2014, passed interim order as follows:- "Pending disposal of the O.A., the impugned Charge M e m o. N o. 2709/ DC/C4/AC(A ) O P 3/G H M C/ 2 0 1 4 - 2 B dated 29.01.2014 is suspended with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the applicant for promotion to the post of Assistant City Planner and his promotion is subject to out come of the OA." 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that in view of the interim order dated 24.02.20L4, no further orders are required in the Writ Petition (TR). Learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents has acceded to the same. 3.

Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this V/rit Petition (TR) is closed. 4.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to cost.

SD/. T. JAYAdREE //TRUE copy// ASSI'TANT REGITITRAR '/ SECTIOTTUFFICER To,'1. One CC to SRI POODATTU AMARENDER Advocate [OPUC]

2. One CC to SRI l\,1R L. DAYAKAR REDDY SC FOR GHMC Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CD Copies EDS CJP k<r

HIGH COURT DATED:0610112023 -aE s \IE Oa o'

q t\i [B ri$ 2[E ) I 'J

ORDER

\ .?

Daa "'

<i::--.jj WP(TR).No.1694 ol 2017 cLostNG THE WR|T PET|TTON (TR) WITHOUT COSTS (o o 2]