Naheed Nazeer v. D. S. Lokesh Kumar (I. A. S)

//.

[ 3166 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOO KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE No:2311 ot 2023 Contempt Case filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to 1971 Waying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pbased to punish respondents for will full disobedience of the order passed by this Court in WP.No.22586 of 2022 dated 18-10-2022. Between:

Naheed Nazeer, Wo Molamqed Abdul Azeem, aged about 61 years, Senior Citizen, Occ: Household, Rl/o H.No. H.No.11-5-43, Beside Nasr Apjrtments, Red Hills, Khairtabad, Hyderabad. - 500004

...Petitioner

AND 1 . D. S. Lokesh Kumdr (1. A. S), The Commissioner Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Office at Tank Bund, Hyderabad. S0dO63.

2. Sri. T Venkanna, The Zonal Commissioner, South Zone, H.No.1g- 1436116h1A,9p-p NAC Building, Nirqui Phootbagh, Chandrayan Gutta, Hyderabad 500005. Circle - 6.

3. Sri. S Jayanth, The Deputy Municipal Commissioner Circle No. 6, GHMC, office at Malakpet Hyderabad. 500036.

4. Sri. Faheem, The Asst- Cily1toy.n p{anner, Circte - 6, Saidabad, Madannapet Mandi Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation.

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. S. MOHD ABDUL RAHEEM KHAN Counsel for the Respondents: PRAVEEN KUMAR VEERJALA (SC FOR GHMC) L The Court made the following: ORDER /

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KI]MAR CONTEMPT CASE No.23ll of 2023 ORDER:

Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent ll I I t Nos.2 to 4 submits that the respondent authorities have passed a speaking order on 13-12-2023 and thus, the respondent authorities have complied with the order of this Court dated 18-10-2022 in W.P.No.22586 o12022.

?. Leamed Standing Counsel further submits that though there has been delay in the respondent authorities complying with the order of this Court, the said delay is neither willful nor wanton and it was purely on account of administrative reasons, and thus, submits that the Court may condone the delay in complying with the order of this Court.

3. Having regard to the above submissions, since the respondent authorities have complied with the orders of this Court, though with delay, the same can be condoned.

4. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. No costs.

5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending if any shall stand closed.

SD/- MOHD. SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR D- //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 'I . One CC to Mr. S. MOHD ABDUL RAHEEM KHAN, Advocate [OPUC] - (ol^JrJ - ^-

rr

2. One CC to SRI PRAVEEN KUIUAR VEERJALA ( SC FOR GHMC) tOpUCl

3. Two CD Copies I kam Pr^q.

I

HIGH COURT DATED:2510112024 6rF TI:

e G'

> o !!

(,1 .\y t c

ORDER

{ \\ &crH * CC.No.2311 of 2023 THE CONTEMPT CASE IS CLOSED l&'>'\'>t^^