← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/3068/2017allowed no costs

Abhinva Mahender v. The State Of Telangana,

2017-04-13A.Shankar Narayana3 pages

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA Crl.P.M.P. No.3018 OF 2017 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.3068 OF 2017 COMMON ORDER:

The present Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is filed by the petitioner - Accused seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.1228 of 2016 on the file of X Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad, for the offences punishable under Section 354, 363 r/w. Section 511 of IPC.

2.

Crl.P.M.P.No.3018 of 2017 in Crl.P.No.3068 of 2017 is filed by the 2nd respondent - defacto-complainant, seeking permission of the Court to compound the aforesaid offences and to quash the proceedings in the above crime. 3.

Both parties as well as their learned counsel are present before this Court and the parties are identified by their respective learned counsel Sri B. Shankar and Sri P.V. Santosh Murthy. The parties have also produced photostat copies of their respective "Aadhaar Cards" in proof of their identity.

4. Perused the affidavit filed by respondent No.2 - defactocomplainant and also the Joint Memo signed by both the parties filed along with the compromise petition in Crl.P.MP.No.3018 of 2017 in Crl.P.No.3068 of 2017. The

ASN,J Crl.P. No.3068 of 2017 petitioner and respondent No.2 - de facto complainant entered into compromise concerning the aforesaid offences. 5.

On being enquired, the de facto complainant expressed that he has no grievance against the petitioner. 6.

Since both the parties have entered into compromise and affirmed the contents of affidavit and the Joint Memo filed in support of the aforesaid compromise petition, compromise is recorded as the dispute falls within the guidelines laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in GIAN SINGH V. STATE OF PUNJAB1.

7.

In view of the above circumstances, Crl.P.MP.No.3018 of 2017 is allowed and, consequently, the present Criminal Petition i.e., Crl.P.No.3068 of 2017 is allowed quashing the proceedings against the petitioner - Accused in C.C.No.1228 of 2016 on the file of X Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad. The affidavit filed by respondent No.2 and the Joint Memo filed by both the parties shall form part of the record.

8.

As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the Criminal Petition shall stand closed.

____________________________ A. SHANKAR NARAYANA, J 13.04.2017.

Msr

1. (2012) 10 SCC 303

ASN,J Crl.P. No.3068 of 2017 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA Crl.P.M.P. No.3018 OF 2017 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.3068 OF 2017 13.04.2017 Msr