Vadita Renukha v. The Reserve Bank Of India
t 34gfi 't.rl
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction) i.
TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE + PRESENT THE HON'BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA AND THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO:25820 F 2025 Between:
1. Vadita Renukha, S/o. Vadita Srinu Nayak, Aged about 35 years, Occ. Business, Rio. P.No.19, Sri Malani Colony, Bapuji Nagar, Tirumjalgiri, Opp. Warangal Race Stores, Hyderabad-S00 011 and also Flat No.502. on Plot No.'129 and 130, 'ANANYA ENCLAVE' Jayabheri Park, Block No.10, Kompally Village, Gandimaisamma Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District.
2. Vanjivaka Subramanyam, S/o.Sugana Kumar, Age 49 years, Occ. Business, Wo. Flat No.101, BNR Kalanjili, Jayabheri Colony, Kompally, Hyderabad-SO0 100.
't0 .t + ...PETITIONERS AND The Reserve Bank of lndia, Hyderabad.
Rep. By its Authorized Officer, Saifabad, 1,, o
2. lClCl Bank Limited, Rep. By its Authorized Officer, # 1-11-256,2nd Floor, Wall Street Plaza. Begumpet, Hyderabad-S00 016.
...RESPONDENTS ,t.
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass order or orders more particularly in the nature of Writ of .t Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to set aside the PreSale-Notice dated: 30.07.2025 issued by the respondents as illegal, null and void without following due process of law and consequently direct the respondent to rt.
process the OTS proposal of the petitioners.
'1,)
r."> 't.o lA NO: 1 OF 2025 ?..
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay 't* all further proceedings in pursuance of the Pre-Sale-Notice dated: 30.07.2025 issued by the respondent including taking physical possession of the property pending disposal of the Writ Petition.
Gounsel for the Petitioner: M/s. R. MADHAVI LATHA Counsel for the Respondents: -- ,f,.
iF The Court made the following: ORDER .'t.
rt.
ir.
rt, ,t, s s rt'
L.
,'
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA AND THE HON'BLE JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT PETITION 20 0F 2025 Mr. R Madhavi Latha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya)
1. After we started dictating the order, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners sought to withdraw the writ Petition.
2.
W.P.No.25B20 of 2025, along with all connected applications, is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn There shall be no order as to costs l -A. SRINIVASA RED ISTANT REG iLil f .ir i ;
!h.t I //TRUE COPY'/ SECTION OFFICER To
1. One CC to M/s. R. tvlADHAVl LATHA, Advocate
2. Two CD CoPies ,;,s YI v"
,;,s .'t, i.l 7
fc t fl;.
n'
';a H|GH COURI ;* DATED:0210912025 ,,1.
Q I ( o '.( tl I ti (( fr 4 t\l[lJ ft.
a.t -
ORDER
WP.No.25820 of 20Zs 'i* ,{ .t + DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS # 'ts r{rfl"4 \fi.
6I.e, ,t, s