Shadan Sultana Nizami , Sameera v. The State Of Telangana

[ 31s8 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW :PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI IA No. 4 OF 2O2O IN CRLP NO: 8005 OF 2019 Between:

Shadan Sultana Nizami @ Sameera, D/o. Azaruddin Nizami .., Petitioner/Accused (Petitioner in CRLP 8005 OF 2019 on the file of High Court) AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad Res po nde nt/Respo nd ent

2. Badavath Vinod Kumar Nayak, S/o. Shankar Nayak, R/o Flat No. 304, Kusaiguda, Spring Avenue Apartments, Rachakonda, Range Reddy District . . Respondent/Com pla inant (Respondents in-do-) Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Petition/ the High Court may be pleased to relax the condition No.lv imposed in the judgment dated lB/02/2020 in Crl.P.No.8005 of 2019, insofar as it relates to directing the petitioner to'report before the concerned police station every Saturday, between 10.00 a.m. and 12.00 noon till completion of investigation and filing of charge-sheet, which is earlier and thereafter the petitioner shall appear before the court concerned on each day of hearing till completion of the trial. Pending disposal of CRLP No.8005 of 2019, on the file of the High Court.

CRLP NO: 8005 OF 2019 Petition under Sections 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed therein, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioner /Accused on bail in F.l.R,No.13 of 2019 on the file of Police Station Amberpet, Hyderabad The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the order of the High Court dated 78.O2,2O2O made in Crl.P., and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P V Krishnaiah Advocate for the Petitloner and of Asst.

ORDER

Heard learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the respo n d ent-state and perused the record.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner mainly submits that the petitioner has been complying with the said condition from the date of his release, r

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor has fairly conceded to the fact with regard to compliance of the condition by the petitioner from the date of his release.

In view of the above and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the condition imposed in the order, dated 18.02,2020 in Crl.P.No.8005 of 2019, directing the petitioner to appear before the concerned Police Station on every Saturday till filing of the charge sheet, is hereby relaxed.

Accordingly, the LA. is ordered.

sD/- cH' v I(ATESWARLU ASSISTA T GISTRAR //TRUE C)PY// SE OFFICER To, 1.

2.

3.

The VI Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad. The VI Additional Chief Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Secunderabad. The IV Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Nampally, Hyderabad. The Station House OFficer, Amberpet Police Station, Amberpet, Hyderabad. One CC to Sri P.V.Krishnaiah, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad (OUT) One spare copy.

5.

6.

HIGH COURT GSDJ DATED:20lOA/2O2O !

ORDER

Il\ l\o. 4 OF 2O2O IN Clllt.P tt{O: 8OO5 OF 2019 DIIiIECT]tON