← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/28268/2023withdrawn

Mudavath Parvathi v. The State Of Telangana

2023-10-10B.Vijaysen Reddy4 pages

t.

L l a t 3183I HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 28268 OF 2023 Between:

Mudavath Parvathi, Wo Jaipal, aged about 28 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Yedlagadda Thanda, Dindi Village, Dindi Mandal, Nalgonda District. ...PETITIONER AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Building, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Chief Commissioner, Land Administration, Nampally, Telangana State, Hyderabad.

3. The District Collector, Nagarkurnool, Nagarkurnool District.

4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kalwakurthi Division, Nagarkurnool District.

5. The Tahsildar, Vangoor Mandal, Nagarkurnool District.

6. The Station House Officer, Vangoor Police Station, Vangoor Mandal, Nagarkurnool District.

7. Singa Joji Poshaiah, S/o Muthaiah, aged about 61 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o H.No.5-79, D.N.T. Colony, Dindi Village, Dindl Mandal, Nalgonda District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 oI lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos.5 and 6 in interfering into the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's agriculture land in Sy.No.166lEl2 to an extent of Ac.0.37 gts which situated at Thippareddipalli Revenue Village, Vangoor Mandal, Nagarkurnool District, by colluding with the 7th respondent, and trying to dispossess the petitioner from his

above land, without issuing any notice to the petitioner, without following due process of law, and trying to change the land of the petitioner on the name of the 7th respondent, without following the due process of law is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, violation of Articles 14 and 300-4 of the constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondent Nos.S and 6 not to enter into the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's agriculture land in Sy.No.166/E/2 to an extent of Ac.0.

37 gts which situated at Thippareddipalli Revenue Village, Vangoor Mandal, Nagarkurnool District, not to collude with the 7th respondent, not to dispossess the petitioner from her above land, to issue any notice to the petitioner, to follow due process of law, and not to change the land of the petitioner on the name of the 7th respondent. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pteased to direct the respondent Nos.5 and 6 not to enter into the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners agriculture land in Sy.No.166lEt2 to an extent of Ac.0.

37 gts which situated at Thippareddipalli Revenue Village, Vangoor Mandal, Nagarkumool District, not to collude with the 7th respondent, not to dispossess the petitioner from her above land, to issue any notice to the petitioner, to follow due process of law, and not to change the land of the petitioner on the name of the 7th respondent pending disposal of the wiit petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 5: Gp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.6: Gp FOR HOME Counsel forthe Respondent No.

.'7 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.28268 OF 2023 ORDER: (ORAL) Mr. Rapolu Bhaskar, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to file a fresh writ petition and to that effect, an endorsement made an endorsement on the case bundle.

2.

Permission is accorded.

3.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition stand closed.

SD/- V.KAVITHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, I

1. One CC to SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate [OPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana. IOUT]

3. Two CCs to GP FOR HOlVlE, High Court forthe State of Telangana. [OUT]

4. Two CD Copies BSR GJ ${a'

HIGH COURT DATED:1011012023

ORDER

--;tAfE Or WP.No.28268 of 2023 o 1$\ ,\\\\ f t 0 o * } DESePl DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS \?'\ $J* )-\