V. Vidyasagar Rao, v. The Deputy Executive Engineer, Rajiv Vidya Mission,

l32s2l HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA WRIT PETITION NO: 2358 OF 2014 Between:

V. Vidyasagar Rao,, Sio. Narayana Rao, Aged about 48 years, Contractor, Rl/o. Gadiagowraram village, Chinthapally Mandal, Nalgonda District, A.P. .....PETITIONERS AND

1. The Deputy Executive Engineer, Rajiv Vidya Mission, Boyaguda, Nalgonda District, A.P.

2. The Head Master (ZPHS), Gadiagowraram village, Chinthapally Mandal, Nalgonda District, A.P.

3- The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by Principal, Secretary, Finance Dept. Secretariat, Hyderabad, A.P.

.....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the 2nd respondent herein in not paying/ releasing the due bill for an amount of Rs.540001 for the work construction of Addl. Class Room at ZPHS, Gadiagowraram village of Chinthapally Mandal, Nalgonda District, A.P. is bad, arbitrary, illegal, unjust, unreasonable and consequently direct the respondent to pay the said bill amount as instructed by the 1st respondent herein in his letter dated 25-07-2012. |.A.NO:1 OF 2014 (WPMP.NO:2869 OF 2014) Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to pay the bill amount of Rs. 54000/ - in concerned with

the work construction of Addl. class Room at ZpHS, Gadiagowraram village of Chinthapally Mandal, Nalgonda District, A.p., as instructed by the l"trespondent herein in his letter dated 25-072012.

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI P.VENKATESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI BHASKAR GORLA Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Gp FOR EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : Gp FOR FINANCE AND PLANN|NG The Court made the following ORDER

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA Writ Petition No.235a ot 2f)L4

ORDER

It is represented by both the learned counsel on record that in view of the interim orders passed by this Court on 07.O2.2O14 in Writ Petition No.2358 of 2014, the relief sought for by the petitioner has been granted by the respondents, therefore, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition.

Recording the said submission of the learned counsel on record, the Writ Petition is closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall also stand closed. SD/. MOHD. SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTANT REGIS R //TRUE COPY// \ SECTI OFFICER To

1. Two CCs to GP For Education, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUTI

2. fwo CCs to'Gp Fbr Finance and Planning' High Court for the State of Telangana at HYderabad. [OUT]

3. One CC to Sri P.Venkateswar Rao, Advocate IOPUCI

4. One CC to Sri Bhaskar Gorla, Advocate [OPUC]

5. Two CD Copies SA GJP \-

HIGH COURT DATED:1511212023 TA S rE e t\ v tA}l 2[2[ q oo

ORDER

1g C)L -lt WP.No.2358 of 2014 a t t) ta CLOSING THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS.

2h