High Court for State of TelanganaWP/18345/2008dismissed as non prosecution

Ramdas Balaraj v. The Special Deputy Collector

2023-03-06Mummineni Sudheer Kumar4 pages

[ 32s6 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 18345 OF 2008 Between:

Ramdas Balaraj, S/o late R. Yellaiah Business Plot No.35/A Sai Suprabath Hostel Sai Nagar Malkajgiri, R.R District ...PETITIONER AND

1. The Special Deputy Cotlector, Unit-lV O.R.R.P Huda Complex Tarnaka, Hyderabad

2. The Tahasildar, Keesara (M) Keesara,R.R District

3. M/s. Metasin Telecome Pvt Ltd, rep.by its Director Manda Srinivas, S/o. Sekharaiah Business 46 Flat No.302 Jyothi Appartments Polt No.70 Mahesh Nagar R.R District ECIL Post Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1&2'rejecting the pleas of the Writ Petitioner for apportionment of compensation of acquiring the land of the petltioner for outer Ring Road Project(ORRP) an extent of 1-00 acre in Sy.No.166 at Dayara (V) Keesara(M) R.R District as arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent No.1 to pay the compensation amount to the land acquired on par with the other lands at Dayara(V) Keesara(M) R.R District.

ij II Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents Nos 1&2 not to make the compensation amount of the Ii ii :

petitioner to the respondent No.3 of the land an extent of 1-00 acre in Sy.No.166 at Dayara (V) Keesara(M) R.R District pending disposal of the WP. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI J. SOMASUNDARAM Gounsel for the Respondent No.1 & 2: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI M. SIVANANDA KUMAR The Court made the following: ORDER t , j !

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.l8B4S of 2OO8 ORDER:

when this matter was listed on 16.02.2023, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner either in the forenoon or in the afternoon, this court directed to list the matter under the caption "for Dismissal,,. Inspite of it, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner either in the forenoon or in the afternoon. Therefore, this court is constrained to dismiss the writ petition for default/ non_prosecution.

Accordingry, the writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Misce,aneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand dismissed.

SD/- MOHD. SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// To,1. One CC to SRI J. SOMASUNDARAM, Advocate [OPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION, High Court for the State of Telangana.IOUTI

3. One CC to SRI M. SIVANANDA KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD Copies BN\ GJP N "rJV \,x :

t t l

'l HIGH COURT DATE :06/03/2023 *E sTArc:

.( 4.

ORDER

!) 1 $ [P$ ?$23 WP.No.18345 of 2008 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS