R. Satyanarayana v. The Deputy Director Of Tribal Welfare Officer

[ 32551 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) NO: 4681 OF 2017 Between:

1. R. Satyanarayana, S/o Bhrahmaiah, aged about 50 Years, School Assistant (Maths), Govt. Ashram High School (Girls), Post Devapur, Mandal Kasipet Adilabad District.

2. K.Ravinder, S/o Yadagiri, aged about 49 years, School Assistant (Maths), Govt. Ashram High School, Salugupalli, Bejjur Mandal, Adilabad Dist. ...APPLICANTS AND The Deputy Director of Tribal Welfare Officer, L.T.D.A., Utnoor, Adilabad Dist. 1.

The Project Officer, LT.D.A., Utnoor, Adilabad Dist., 2.

The Commissioner of Tribal Welfare, Govt. of Telangana, at Masab Tank, Hyderabad.

J.

The State of Telangana, represented By its Principal Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

4.

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare that the applicants are entitled to be transferred to the schools situated in plain area of Adilabad District on the basis of the entitlement points in the ensuing transfer counseling since the applicants were appointed/posted in plain area with all consequential benefits in terms of Notification issued in G.O.Ms.No.3 SW dt.10.01.2000 by holding the action of the respondents in not considering the claim of the applicants for transfer to plain ared schools is illegal and contrary to the Notification vide G"O.Ms.No.3 dt.l0.0'1 .2009, discriminatory and unjust, andpass such other and further orders Counsel for the Applicants:SRl K.NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following: ORDER

HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN I(UMAR I /RIT PETITION (TR) No.4681 OF 2017 ORDER:

Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition (TR) does not survive for further adjudication and the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents has fairly acceded the same. 2.

Recording the above submission of the counsel appearing on either side, the Writ Petition (TR) is dismissed as infructuous. 3.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to cost.

SD/. T. JAYASREE ASSlsrAur REGISTRAR / //TRUE COPY// ( ll'i / SECTION OFFICER \ To,

1. One CC to SRI K NARAYANAAdvocate-[OP-UC] i: i;; 6d;i" GP ioC SociAf weLFARd ,Hish Court ror the State or Telangana at HYderabad[OUT]

3. Two CD CoPies EDS GJP

,!-all HIGH COUR]'

DATED:19112.12022 l I {rtE ST4k q ,^ e 0 6 trB 2$i3 C) *t /t c) L) * .,i'

/,J )t i:\

ORDER

WP(TR).No.4681 of 2017 DrsMtsstNc t THE WRrT pETtTtON (TR) AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS LAJ @ Oo.j,.5 iv'\