Vetsa Geetha v. Chalasani Siva Nageswara Rao,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2760 of 2016 ORDER:

The grievance with which the petitioner has come up with the above revision petition, is that his application for interim injunction pending the suit, has been kept pending for the past two years without being disposed of.

Heard Mr. K. Devendar, learned counsel for the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner cannot be belittled. An application for interim injunction pending the suit is required to be taken up and disposed of as early as possible. The disposal of an interlocutory application for injunction cannot take as much time as the suit itself will take.

But if a direction is issued to the trial Court now to dispose of the interlocutory application within a time frame, either of the parties may take it on appeal and further proceedings in the suit may get stalled. Since the petitioner has already been accustomed to not being armed with an interim order, he can wait for some more time and get the suit disposed of at the earliest.

Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of directing the trial Court at least dispose of the suit within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. __________________________ JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN 17th June, 2016 Js.

Note: C.C. in one week.