Shaik Aizaz v. The State Of Telangana
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.11091 of 2025 ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed before this Court to enlarge the petitioner-accused No.2 on bail in Crime No.206 of 2025 of Allapur Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate, registered for the offence punishable under Section 108 read with 3(5) of BNS. 2 .
The brief facts of the case are that, the de-facto lodged a report with the Police stating that the deceased was a native of Kasipet village in Adilabad District, had been married to Smt. Amala for 15 years and they had one son. Due to lack of employment, the family moved to Hyderabad and resided in a rented house at Borabanda. Both husband and wife worked as housekeepers at different locations. The deceased later discovered that his wife was allegedly involved in an illicit relationship with a man named Aijaz, which led to frequent quarrels between them. A panchayat was convened by village elders, during which the wife of the deceased was warned to cease her alleged illicit activities. However, she continued the relationship despite repeated counseling. Distressed by her actions and burdened by financial difficulties, the deceased expressed his inability to cope and
ultimately died by suicide, falling under a running train and succumbing to fatal injuries on the spot.
3.
Heard Sri Shaik Khalid, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Sri Arun Kumar Doddla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent-State. 4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the alleged offences. Apart from a vague allegation regarding a bond, there are no specific accusations indicating that the petitioner abetted the deceased in committing suicide. He further stated that the petitioner was arrested on 28.07.2025, and a substantial part of the investigation has already been completed. None of the alleged offences are directly or specifically attributable to the petitioner, and prayed the Court to grant bail to the petitioner by allowing this criminal petition.
5.
On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, contending that the allegations against the petitioner are grave in nature and that the investigation is still ongoing, releasing the petitioner on bail at this stage may lead to tampering
with evidence or intimidation of witnesses and prayed the Court to dismiss the criminal petition.
6.
In the light of the submissions made by both the learned counsel and upon perusal of the material available on record, it is evident that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 28.07.2025. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, including the nature of the allegations, the stage of investigation, and the period of incarceration, this Court finds it appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:
i.
The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-XII Additional Metropolitan Magistrate Medchal-Malkajgiri District at Kukatpally.
ii.
The petitioner shall appear before the concerned SHO at 11:00 A.M., on every Monday for a period of eight (8) week or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required.
iii.
The petitioner shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C.
(presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS).
7.
Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 11.09.2025 SS
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.11091 of 2025 Date: 11.09.2025 SS