Kandi Venkateswara Rao, S/O Late Satyanarayana, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR WRI T PETI TI ON No.1104 OF 2017 ORDER:

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. With their consent, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself.

2.

The present Writ Petition came to be filed with the following prayer:

"...to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned Memo by the 1st respondent vide Memo No.31617/Regn.II/A1/2012-4, dt.31.08.2015 refusing to renew the Notary, as being illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of Notaries Act and rules and in violation of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same by directing the respondents to renew the notary licence of the petitioners." 3.

It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the issue involved in the writ petition is squarely covered by an Order of this Court, dated 02.12.2016, rendered in W.P.No.9655 of 2016 and Batch. The same is not disputed by the learned Government Pleader for Revenue.

4.

In that view of the matter, following the said order, this Writ Petition is allowed in terms of the Order dated 02.12.2016 passed in W.P.No.9655 of 2016 and Batch.

CPK,J WP_1104_2017 Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ JUSTI CE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR Date:06.01.2017 Note:

Registry is directed to attach copy of the order, dated 02.12.2016 in W.P.No.9655 of 2016 & Batch to this order.

(B/o) INL