T.Satyanarayana And 6 Others v. The General Manager,S.C.R And 3 Others

[ 3308 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 24383 OF 2010 Between:

1. T. Satyanarayana, S/o. Subrahmanyam, O/o. XEN/C/RJY, South Central Railway, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District

2. A.V.R.Subrahmanyam, S/o. A.S.R.Anjaneyulu, Section Engineer, Oio. PCE/OUSC, 5th Floor, Railway Nilayam, Secunderabad.

3. Md. Rafiq Ahmed, S/o. Hussaini Peeran, aged 5'l years, Section Engineer, O/o.DRMM/GTL South Central Railway, Guntakal, Anantapur District.

4. Smt. S. Sudharani, Wo. S.S.R.K.Prasad, Section Engineer, O/o. PCE/OL/SC, 5th Floor, Railway Nilayam, Secunderabad.

5. N.S. Maddileti Reddy, S/o. Venkat Reddy, Assistant Manager, Rail Vikas Nigam Limited, Oxford Plaza, S.D. Road, Secunderabad.

6. S.K.Safdar Ali, S/o.Miya Saheb, Section Engineer, Dy.CE/C/HX, South Central Railway, Kadapa District

7. K.Elisha Rao, S/o. K. Ankulu, Section Engineer, O/o. DRMM/NED, South Central Railway, Nanded, Maharastra State.

...PETITIONERS ANO

1. The General Manager, South Central Railway, Nilayam, Secunderabad.

2. The Chief Personnel Officer, South Central Railway, Railway Nilayam, Secunderabad.

3. The Principal Chief Engineer, South Central Railway, 5th Floor, Railway Nilayam, Secunderabad.

4. The Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad rep.by its Registrar, Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be

pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to and connected with orders in OA No.353 of 2009 dated 4-6-2010 on the file of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench at Hyderabad and quash or set aside the same as arbitrary, and opposed to settle principles of service jurisprudence in so far as directing the respondents 1to 3 to maintain status-quo and consequently hold that the petitioners are entitled to be continued as Section Engineers with all consequential benefits.

|.A.NO:1 OF 20'I0(WPMP. NO: 31214 OF 2010) Petition Under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ln OA No.353/2009 dated 4-6-2010 insofar as directing the respondents 1to 3 to maintain Status-quo, and further direct the respondents 1 to 3 to continue the petitioners as section Engineers pending disposal of the writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI.D.LINGA RAO Counsel for the Respondents : SRI.G.VENKATESHVARLU, CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL The Court made the following ORDER

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHTNAND KUMAR SHAVTLI AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH W.P.No.24383 of 2010 ORDER roer nKS..r):

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners has informed the Court that during pendency of the Writ Petition, the petitioners have retired from the service after attaining the age of superannuation and thus rendering the Writ petition as infructuous.

Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/. B. SATYAVATHI DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII sEcTtoN o#rrceR

1. One CC to SRI.D.LINGA RAO, Advocate IOPUC]

2. One CC to SRI.G.VENKATESHVARLU, CENTRAL GOW COUNSEL tOpUCI

3. Two CD Copies

4. One spare copy To S'A ,, GJPA],.---'

HIGH COURT DATED:12 10912022 '9\ I * s i =$ ,-l ., (,

ORDER

*\ WP.No.24383 of 2010 'l!

.:) |;.],1.

DISMISSING THE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.

S