Goulla Thimmappa v. The State Of Telangana

1321s I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION NO: 24448 OF 2018 Between:

Goulla Thimmappa, S/o. Goulla Karreppa, aged about 44 Years, R/o. H.No. '1156, Rayapuram Village, Ghattu Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal District, Telangana State. ..PETITIONER AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Agricultural Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. The District Collector (Agriculture), Jogulamba Gadwal District, Telangana State.

3. The Joint Collector, Gadwal, Agricultural Department, Jogulamba Gadwal District, Telangana State.

4. The District Agricultural Office, Jogulamba Gadwal District, Telangana State ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lMandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in pursuance of thorough scrutiny of the petitioners application and including the names of others who were not even sanctioned and removal of his name from the approved list of Subsidy Farmers thereby denying the petitioner herein subsidy to which he is entitled as per the scheme is as illegal improper and arbitrary.

lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to grant subsidy as per the Scheme, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI SRINIVASU L Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR AGRICULTURE The Court made the following: ORDER

I THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI / WRIT PETITION NO.24448 OF 2018

ORDER

In spite of listing the matter under the caption 'for dismissal', there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner both in the forenoon session as well as in the post noon session. on earlier occasion also, i.e., on23.09.2024, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, it is presumed that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the Writ Petition.

2.

The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed for default' Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this Writ Petition shall also stand dismissed.

SD/-A.V,S.PRASAD ASSISTANT REGI R //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFF ICER To, One CC to SRI L.SRINIVASU' Advocate' [OPUC] \ TwoCCstoGPFoRAGR|CULTURE,HighCourtfortheStateofTelangana. louTl

3. Two CD CoPies.

BSK GJPq.

I , HIGH COURT DATED:2811012024 \ 1Lt, 1_, s 4?'

,a v s C>a o t

ORDER

c H9l$ * WP.No.24448 of 2018 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS ca\@ \-Y- (*w \o