Syed Muqtader Jaweed v. The State Of Telangana And 3 Others
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT I{YDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE ]USTICE G SRI DEVI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1851 OF 2018 Revision filed under Section 397 and 401 of CrPC setting aside the order, Dated O8th day of May 2018 in M.P. NO 177 OF 2018 In M. C No.337 of 2017, on the file of the Court Additional Metropolitan Session Judge for The Trail of JHCBBC Cum Family Court Cum XXIII Additional Chief Judge Hyderabad Between:
Syed Muqtader Jaweed, Occ-Private Service, R/o H. No B-2-23U817, Sri Krishna Nagar, Yousufguda, Hyderabad, T.S.
.....REVrSrON/ PETTTTON ER AND
1. The State of Telangana represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Couft At Hyderabad
2. Hareema Azra, R/o H. No 8-1-332/ 3tAttzs,*"., *;';;::tJo"J;:lJ,:il" Tolichowki, Hyderabad,T.S.
3. Baby Syeda Ayesha Maar'rj, R/o H. No B-1-332/3lA/129, Road No 2, Arvind Nagar Colony, Tolichowki, Hyderabad,T.S.
4. Master Syed Aaraaf Mujtaba, R/o H. No B-L-332131A1L29, Road No. 2, Arvind Nagar Colony, Tolichowki, Hyderabad ,T.S. (Respondent/Petitioner No. 3 and 4 being minor is represented by their mother Mrs. HALEEMA AZRA Wo Syed Muqtader Jaweed) .....RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS 1 TO 3 IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 482 CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the execution of the order, passed by the Additional Metropolitan Session Judge for the trial of JHCBBC cum Family Court cum XXIII Additional Chief Judge, Hyderabad in M.P. NO I77 OF 2018 IN M. C No 337 of 2077 dated 08th day of May 2018, granting interim Maintenance to the Respondent/Petitioner No 1 @ Rs 10,000/- P.
l\,l (Rs Ten Thousand only) and to the Respondents/Petitioners no 2 and 3 @ Rs 2,5001- (Rs Two Thousand Five Hundred only) per month from the date of Petition i.e.
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No. 185 1 of 2O 18 ORDER:
Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that the cause in this Criminal Revision Case does not survive for further adjudication and the Criminal Revision Case has become infructuous.
2.
Recording the aforesaid submission, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous.
3.
Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand dismissed.
Sd/-CH.VENKATESHWARLU DEPUTYREGISTRAR \ Lit \ SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPYII To,
1. The Additional Metropolitan Session Judge for The Trail of JHCBBC Cum Family Court Cum XXIII Additional Chief Judge Hyderabad
2. One CC to SRI. SYED AHMED ALI Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CCs to the PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]
4. Two CD Copies
5. One Spare Copy
HIGH COURT DATEDt25l06l2O2L I 't S &' o 9'9 () t:)oo JA JUIt0u1 at t
ORDER
CRLRC.No.1851 of 2018 I oESpA-I DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE AS INFRUCTUOUS )4