← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/6882/2017disposed of no costs

Dr.B.Sathish Kumar, v. The State Of Telangana,

2017-03-01P Naveen Rao3 pages

Date : 1.3.2017 Between :

Dr B. Satish Kumar S/o B Upender Anastasia, Osmania General Hospital, Hyderabad And others Petitioner And The State of Telangana Health Medical and Family Welfare Department Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad Rep by its principal Secretary to Government and others Respondents The Court made the following:

ORAL ORDER:

Petitioners were prosecuting post graduation in medical course. Petitioners claim that as in-service candidates, when they are prosecuting the post graduation medical course, they are also entitled to full salary and allowances as applicable to the post, held by them, whereas, no pay and allowances are paid nor any stipend is paid to them. Ventilating their grievances, some of the petitioners have submitted representations to the Commissioner/ 2nd respondent and some other petitioners have submitted representations to the Head of the Institute, where they are studying. It is seen from the representations enclosed to the material paper book, no representation is made to the Principal Secretary to Government/first respondent, who is competent authority.

In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to make representation to the first respondent and as and when such representation is received, first respondent shall consider the request of the petitioners and pass appropriate orders as warranted by law by assigning due reasons and communicate the decision to the petitioners within a period of six weeks thereon. No costs. Having regard to the same, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, are closed.

______________ P NAVEEN RAO,J DATE: 1.3.2017 TVK

Date : 1.3.2017