← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/40046/2014closed no costs

Darsha Namdev, v. State Of Telangana,

2018-11-08P.Keshava Rao2 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE P.KESHAVA RAO WRI T PETI TI ON NO.40046 OF 2014 ORDER:

Heard both sides.

2.

The prayer sought in the Writ Petition is as under: "....to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or order or direction declaring the action of the respondents 2 & 3 in interfering in civil disputes and forcing the petitioner to handover possession of his house bearing premises No. 1-214/19/22/1, Shanti Nagar, Adilabad, Adilabad District, admeasuring 361.28 sq yards to the 4th respondent as illegal and arbitrary and beyond the scope of their powers and consequently direct the respondents 2 & 3 not to interfere in civil disputes and force the petitioner to handover possession of his house bearing premises No 1-2-14/19/22/1, Shanti Nagar, Adilabad, Adilabad District, admeasuring 361.28 sq.yards to the 4th respondent and further direct the respondents 2 & 3 to register the complaint of the petitioner against the 4th & 5th respondents."

3.

Learned GP appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 placed on record, the written instructions dated 29.12.2014 issued by the Sub-Inspector of Police, I Town Police Station, Adilabad, stating that except registering a case in Cr.No.259 of 2014 under Sections 420 and 506 IPC on the file of I Town Police Station, Adilabad on 27.12.2014, respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have

neither harassed the petitioner nor interfered in the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent Nos. 4 and 5, more particularly, forcing the petitioner to hand over possession of premises bearing No.1-2-14/19/22/1, Shanti Nagar, Adilabad to respondent No.4. Pursuant to the registration of crime, respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have taken up investigation. In order to prevent respondent Nos. 2 and 3 from taking up investigation, as a precautionary measure, the petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition. It is also stated in the written instructions that if at all any action has to be taken against the petitioner, due process of law will be followed.

4.

In the light of the said statement made in the written instructions, this Court is of the opinion that no further orders are required in the Writ Petition.

5.

The written instructions are made part of the record. 6.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand closed. No order as to costs.

_______________ P. KESHAVA RAO,J Date: 8.11.2018 KPM