← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWA/443/2013dismissed as infructuous

K.Dhanunjaya Reddy, Hyd v. Rajiv Udyogasri Society, Hyd And Another

2023-11-22Abhinand Kumar Shavili,Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao3 pages

[ 3318 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO wRlT APPEAL NO: 443 OF 2013 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 19.03.2013 in W.P.No.1 72O of 2012 on the file of the High Court. Between:

K.Dhanunjaya Reddy, S/o. K. Narasimha Rl/o. Flat No.408, Sai Spurthy Enclave, Hyderabad - 500 045.

Reddy, aged about 46 years, Venkatagiri, Yousufguda Post, ...APPELLANT AND 1.

Rajiv Udyogasri Society, Rep. by its Chief Executive Officer and Secretary to Government, Labour, Employment, Training and Factories Department, Secretariat Building, Secretariat, Hyderabad. Sri D. Srinivasulu, S/o- Not Known to the Appellant, aged about 57 years' Secretary to Government, LET and F Department, lll Floor' L-Block, A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad, A.P.

...RESPONDENTS l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WAMP. NO: 1119 OF 2013) Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order of the learned Single Judge in W'P.No.1720 of 2012 dated 19.03.2013 to the extent the recovery of alleged excess salary paid vide Memo No.RUS/2/2010 dated 08.09.201 1 is refused to be interfered with and also Memo No.RUS/2/2010 dated 08.09.2011 Counsel for the Appellant: SRI C. SUMON Counsel for the Respondent No.'l: D PRAMADA Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: GP FOR LABOUR The Court Delivered the following: JUDGMENT

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO RIT PPE No 43 0F 201 JUDGMENT: (Per AKS,J) Learned counsel for the appellant has informed the Court that the subject matter of the Writ Appeal has become infructuous. 2.

Recording the said submission, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Applications, if any, pending in this Writ Appeal. sha ll stand closed.

SDIK.SAILESHI DEPUW yilsrRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to Sri C Sumon Advocate [OPUC]

2. One CC to M/s. D Pramada, Advocate [OPUC]

5. i*o CCt to GP for Labour, High Courtfor the State of Telangana' at Hyderabad [OUTI

4. Two CD Copies TJ BS $\5

HIGH COURT DATED:2211112023

JUDGMENT

T S r € ( WA.No.443 of 2013 J v oI ,+ 0 3 JAN 2024 j gO tr * * D s PAI DISMISSING THE WRIT APPEAL AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.

oruro 'w \ \ru"