Pawar Heeralal v. The State Of Telangana
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION No.24659 OF 2018 ORDER:
This writ petition is filed seeking a writ of Mandamus, declaring the proceedings dated 26.06.2018 of the 3rd respondent as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, violative of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and sought a consequential direction to consider the cases of the petitioners for promotion to the post of Tahsildar in terms of the approved final Naib Tahsildar panel for the year 2015-16, dated 10.12.2016, and integrated seniority list dated 12.06.2018 issued by the 2nd respondent, with all consequential benefits.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
It has been contended by the petitioners that they are fully eligible and qualified for promotion to the post of Tahsildar for the panel year 2015-16 and though the respondents have prepared the integrated seniority list on 12.06.2018, so far they have not considered the cases of the petitioners for promotion to the post of Tahsildar strictly in terms of the said integrated seniority list. Counsel for the petitioners submitted that this Court granted interim order on 19.07.2018 directing the respondents to keep two posts of Tahsildar vacant. Counsel for the petitioners further submitted that ends of justice would be met if appropriate orders be passed in the writ petition directing the respondents to consider the
AKS,J W.P.No.24659_2018 cases of the petitioners for promotion to the post of Tahsildar strictly in terms of integrated seniority list dated 12.06.2018. Government Pleader for the respondents had contended that the cases of the petitioners would be considered in accordance with the Rules.
This Court, having considered the rival submissions of learned counsel for the parties, is of the considered view that this writ petition can be disposed of directing the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners for promotion to the post of Tahsildar in the existing vacancies, if the petitioners are otherwise eligible, and pass appropriate orders within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, J 13th August 2019 v v