P.Prahallada Reddy v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.9204 of 2015 BETWEEN P. Prahallada Reddy.

... PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, (Home). Secretariat, Hyderabad and others.

...RESPONDENTS The Court made the following:

ORDER:

Heard.

2. Petitioner alleges that he is cable TV operator and carries on business in providing cable TV network to various villages mentioned in the prayer. Alleging that respondent police are interfering with the said business of the petitioner, the present writ petition is filed.

3. Instructions of the learned Government Pleader, however,

state that petitioner is eking out his livelihood by operating cable TV Network and managing the cable TV connections in the villages. However, the allegations of the petitioner that police are interfering with his business activities etc. are totally denied. Respondents, therefore, state that unnecessary allegations are made against the police though there is no interference.

4. In view of the said categorical statement of the respondents that they are not interfering with the petitioner's cable TV business, no further directions are required.

The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

______________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J April 16, 2015 LMV