Angadi Upender , Upender Prasad And Another v. State Of Telangana

[ 32s1 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF SEPTEIUBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8275 OF 2022 Between:

1. Angadi Upender @ Upender Prasad, S/o. Bikasham.

2. Santhosh Lalji Baranwal, S/o. Lalji Barnwal, ...PETITIONER AND The State of Telangana, Through SHO, PS Vanasthalipuram, Rachakonda District Rep. By its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana.

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Sections $A4g of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitionersi accused No. 2 and 3 on Regular Bail in Crime No. 1082 ot 2021 on the file of SHO, PS Vanasthalipuram, Rachakonda District. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. K. VENKATESWAR RAO ,Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Assistant Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent. The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SIJRENDER CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8275 OF 2022 ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed under Sections 437 and 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short "Cr.P.C.") seeking to eniarge the petitioners/A2 & A.3 on bail in connection with Crime No.1OB2 of 2O2l on the file of Vanasthalipuram Police Station, Rahakonda, lor the offence punishable under Section 8(c) read with Section 2l(b)(II)(C) of NDPS Act, 1985 (Amendment Act, 2001).

\ \ \ 2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State. Perused the record.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, petitioners/Al & A2 are languishing in jail from 1g. 12.2O;2L. He further submits that the entire investigation is complete and charge sheet is also filed, hence, the petitioners/A2 & A3 can be granted bail.

4.

In the said circumstances, to meet the ends ol justice the Trial Court i.e. XXIV Additional Metropolital Magistrate Cyberabad at Hayathnagar, is directed to fix schedule and complete trial within a period of four (04) months, failing which the petitioners/A2 & A3 would be at liberty to move for bail.

5.

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed off. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any pending, sha-ll stand closed.

V SD/.B.SATYAVATHI DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To XXIV Additional Metropolitan Magistrate Cyberabad, at Hayatnagar The SHO, Police Station Vanasthalipuram, Rachakonda District One CC to The Public Prosecutor High Court For The State Of Telangana, at Hyderabad, Advocate [OUT] One CC to Sri. K. Venkateswar Rao, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies One Spare copy sk P J

it HIGH COURT DATED:211O9t2022 t t- .'\\ ,""'\\ t'\ .I(J .rii/ / s qJ ea cA

ORDER

) t CRLP.No.8275 ot 2022 ?-triC.).

""9 \\ 1) Disposing of the Criminal Petition {n t/ l1/