Syed Eesa Imran v. The State Of Telangana,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR WRI T PETI TI ON No.23593 OF 2017 ORDER:

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Home for the State of Telangana appearing for respondents 1 to 7. With their consent, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself.

2.

Since this Court is not going into the merits of the case, it may not be necessary to issue notice to respondents 8 to 13. 3.

The present Writ Petition came to be filed seeking issuance of writ of mandamus, declaring the inaction of respondent No.7 in taking any action against respondents 8 to 13 pursuant to the complaint dated 05.06.2017, in spite of the repeated visits as being illegal and arbitrary, consequently, direct respondent No.7 to forthwith act upon the complaint dated 05.06.2017 and take action against respondents 8 to 13 in accordance with law. 4.

At the time when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Government Pleader for Home submits that since the action now sought is against four police stations, it is quite erroneous and illegal to direct all police stations to register the crime basing on the same action.

5.

At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to

CPK,J WP_23593_2017 make a fresh petition making allegations of inaction against one particular police station.

6.

Having regard to the above, permission as sought for is accorded.

7.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn giving liberty to the petitioner as sought for.

Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. There shall be n order as to costs. _______________________ JUSTI CE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR Date:25.07.2017 INL