Andhra Pradesh Neelikula Sangham, Hyderabad v. A Laxmikantha Rao, Hyderabad And 1 Other
IN THE HIGH COURT
^fSIrHlBlt E oF rELANGANA WEDNESDAY, TH rworibuili,Jli,-J#.rg"og^*", rHE HoNouRABLE sRr rrtTl"TI.rr=NKATEsHWARA REDD' IVIL R VISI NP TITI N F2016 Petition under Sectir the order a nd decree ",,;J ::,1 ::[ Hl :::' ffl:: i[ :: T;"T :H: X;i;irlXr:"ted 2s/07t14 made in EA No.22t2013 in Ep No.2el2012, in RC Between:
Andhra Pradesh Neelikulz fiii:.,:,#iftri',iliif,.Jtfi.lf #tHx]'.Jfi?ii,i.1ffi:,331i,X33;,.,06,'j:,Sffi,:?l AND ...PET|TIoNER
1. A Laxmikantha Rao, S/o. Narayan Rao.
2. Mr.Daniet phitips, S/6.Jai;;i-'-,"" '..", ...RESPONDENTS This petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the Order of the Lower court and the record in, the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri.Venkat Raghu Ramulu, Advocate for the petitioner and for Respondent The Court made the following: ORDER
(- THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A'VENXATESI{UIARA REDDY oN No.2181 oF2o16 c SION o R DE R:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner' who, has submitted that the matter has become infructuous'
In view of the same' this CRP is dismissed as infructuous' There shail be no order as to the costs' Pending miscellaneous petitions, if anY, Shali stand closed'
^:.giJ{lfHUt[1HiR LI) \ //TRUE COPY/i SECTION OFFICER To lH,?'X3#,{;1i:5."J'-:X?,'1"[:h:lYi.ll3Lt-i#Serabad
3. Two CD CoPies
4. One SPare coPY Ki.
2--
HIGH COURT DATED:16/03/2022 t I I4r T s c s o k t J3 15JUt'l2OZZ f, z
ORDER
.l c r /}A CRP.No.2i81 of 2016 D,SMISSED AS,NFRUCTUOUS.
N.t .
{+\"64