Satthaiah v. Sri.S.A.M.Rizvi, Ias
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI GONTEMPT CASE NO: 1556 OF 2022 Contempt Case Under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents herein for violating, disobeying the orders of the High Court dated 2910312022 in W.P.No.7989 of 2021 Between:
Satthaiah, S/o. Danaiah, Aged about 62 years, Occ. Kamati (Retd), R/o.H.No.186-2331 1, Gowlipura, Falaknuma, Charminar, Hyderabad-500053 ...PETITIONER AND Sri.S.A.tr/.Rizvi, lAS, Special Chief Secretary Health, Medical and Family Welfare (VC) Department, Secretariat Buildings, State of Telangana, -Hyderabad.
2. Sri.Dr.K.Ramesh Reddy, Director of Medical Education, Department, State of Telangana, Hyderabad.
3. Sri. Dr.B.Nagender, Superintendent, Osmania General Hospital, Hyderabad.
4. The Assistant Pay and Accounts Officer, Treasury Branch, Gunfoundry, Hyderabad.
(R4 impleaded as per the court order dtd.02.12.2022 in CC No.1556 of 2022) ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. AJAY KUMAR NERELLA Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: GP for Medical & Health Department Counsel for the Respondent R.No.4: G.P for Services-l The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTTCE P.MADHAVI DEVI CONTEMPT CASE No. L556 of 2o.22 ORDER:
The Contempt Case is filed alleging wilful and deliberate disobedience of the orders of this Court in W.P.No,7989 of 2O2l dated 29.03.2022 by the respondents and to punish the respondents for the sarne.
2. The petitioner alleged that in spite of the directions of this Court, the respondents have not complied with the directions of this Court.
3. After issuance of notice, the respondents have appeared and the Assistant Pay and Accounts Officer has been made as respondent No.4 suo moto by this Court.
4. Learned Government Pleader for Services-I appearing for respondent No.4, today has filed the details of the amount paid to the petitioner by three cheques i.e., two cheques dated 03.1I.2O22 and a cheque dated 2L.12.2O22. It is submitted that the said amount has been deposited I \ \ \ \ into bank account of the petitioner and stated that the --'\_ petitioner has also withdrawn the sarne.
\
'r\.
t.'t PMD,I C.C.No.1556 of 2022
5. Learned. counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer in the Writ Petition was for revision of pension as rvell and since, the writ petition is allowed, the respondents are yet to comply with the said part of the orcler'
6. However, this court finds that in the last para of the order of this court, the direction was on15, to make payment for suspension period. within a period of 9O days from the date of receipt of the copy of the order. since, the said amount has already been paid, this Court does not find that there i-s any- wilful and delibe-rate- di bedience on the of the respondent in complying with the directions of this Court and any case for contempt. The peti.tioner is at liberty to pursue the remedy for revision of pension'
7. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall also Sd/. M. MANJULA oeelrv;rflsrRAR / //TRUE coPY// L lf',- SECTION OFFICER Sri. S.A. M.Rizvi, lAS, Special chief secretary Hegllh, ]vt_ed ical and Fa mily To, welfare (vc) Depa-ri*;nt, s""retariat auildihgs, state of Telangana' SI.:#P*|"* *"oqr, Director of Medical Education, Department, State of i"iingunu, Hyderabad.
.....Contd.
3. Sri. Dr.B.Nagender, Superintendent, Osmania General Hospital, Hyderabad.
4. The Assistant pay and Accounts officer, Treasury arjncrr,trniori.1o.v, Hyderabad.
5. Two CCs to the Medical & Health Department,High Court for the state of
6. Two CCs to the G.P for Services, High Court for the state of Telangana at Hyderabad
7. one cc to SRl. AJAY KUMAR NERELLA, Advocate topucl B. Two CD Copies prv
\ l"
HIGH COURT DATED:30/1 212022
ORDER
CC.No.1556 of 2022 I !.
II 208 03 F O * t.
'-.' "r 'f .*:;
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE 1l-rsfk& 9t5r1d,s