Mohd Abbu Khan , Dada Saheb v. The State Of Telangana And Another

I 13251 )

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY .

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8339 OF 2019 Between:

Mohd Abbu Khan , Dada Saheb, S/o. Mohd Chand Khan, Age. 30 Years, R/o 1-6-777, Ek Minar Masjid, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. ... Petitioner/Acc used No.4 AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep.by Public Prosecutor, High Court For the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.

2. Mrs. Sabha Suriya, D/o. Mohd Aziz Ahmed Khan, Aged 32 years, Occ. Private Lecturer, R/o. H. No.'l-5-545, Bakaram, Musheerabad, Hyderabad.

...Respondents/Complainant

Petition under Section 482 oI Cr-P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for records pertaining to C.C.No.44B of 2015 on the file of Xlll Addl Chief Metropolitan lVlagistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad and quash the same against the petitioneriAccused No.4.

l.A. NO: 1OF 2019 Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including the appearance of the petitioner/Accused No.4 in C.C.No.448 of 2015 on the file of Xlll Addl Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad against the petitioner/Accused No.4, Pending the final disposal of the main Quash Petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri SYED YAQOOB SAJJAD, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No. I and None appearance for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PE?ITION No.8339 OF 2019 ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that 'the petitioner is arrayed as accused No.4. During the pendency of the trial Court, the case was split up against the petitioner and renumbered. The proceedings against Al to A3 u'ere ended in acquittal.

2. The petitioner is at liberty to file quash petition questioning the split up case in which the petitioner is the accused.

3. With the above observation, the criminal petition is disposed of.

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. AS Sd/. N. SRIHARI ISTA]NT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, \l

1. The Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad.

2. The Station House Officer, WPS CCS, DD, Hyderabad.

3. One CC to SRI SYED YAQOOB SAJJAD, Advocate tOpUCl

4. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State 6f Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

5. Two CD Copies SM/plp w

HIGH COURT DATED: 1910212025 {\lE ST4 c c

ORDER

2 z Nrv 2p5 za CRLP.No.8339 of 2019 lr). r /_ HgO DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION ca(cea q Yt- - ;at<Er