K. Chandrakala v. The District Educational Officer
[ 32ss ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) NO:4463 OF 2017 Between:
K. Chandrakala, W/o. Shoban Babu, aged About 45 years, School Assistant (PS), Z.P.H.S., Neredumet, Malkajgiri Mandal, Rangareddy District, Rl/o. Neredumet.
...PETITIONER AND '1 . The District Educational officer, Rangareddy District, Hyderabad. 500004
2. The Commissioner and Director of School Education, State of Telangana, Hyderabad. 500 004.
3. The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad-500 022.
...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Cou( may be pleased to declare that the applicant is entitled for 10 entitlement points under spouse category in terms of Rule 6 (ll) @ of the Transfer Rules issued in G.O.Ms.No. 12, dated 16-6-2015 with all consequential benefits by holding the action of the respondents in not awarding 10 entitlement points under spouse grounds to the applicant on the untenable ground that the applicant and her husband are working in separate districts which is illegal, arbitrary, unjust. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2Q1Z(WVMP0R). NO: 990 O Between:
1. The District Educational officer, Rangareddy District, Hyderabad. 500004
2. The Commissioner and Director of School Education, State of Telangana, Hyderabad. 500 004.
3. The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad-500 022.
...APPLICANTS AND K. Chandrakala, Wo. Shoban Babu, aged About 45 years, School Assistant (PS), Z.P.H.S., Neredumet, Malkajgiri Mandal, Rangareddy District, Rl/o. Neredumet.
...RESPONDENT Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated:10-07-20'15 passed in OA.No.3981/2015. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. D BALA KISHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES The Court made the following: ORDER t l
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) No.4463 OF 2017 ORDER:
Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition (TR) does not survive for further adjudication and the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents has fairly acceded the same. 2.
Recording the above submission of the counsel appearing on either side, the Writ Petition (TR) is dismissed as infructuous. 3.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed' No order as to costs'
sD/-r. NAGALAKSHMT //TRUE COPY// DEPUW REqYfRAR To, ECTTON OFFICER -'1 . One CC to Sri. D Bala Kishan. Rao, Advocate IOPUCI
2. Two CCs to GP for Services, High Court for th-e Statej of Telangana. [OUTI
3. Two CD Copies TJ GJP {K3 \
i
HIGH COURT DATED:05101t2023 ( dE ST4 B FTB ?08 i o
ORDER
iq k, r:9 TC\i ESp/r * WP(TR).No.4463 ot 2017 ---.
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION (TR) AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
rDrrr"
"vv9, ^ .p\oq"