Goluguri Satti Reddy v. State Of Andhra Pradesh

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B. SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.535 of 2017 ORDER:

Heard both sides.

At the time of compounding the offence, the amount of Rs.1,45,000/- seized from the possession of A.1 to A.8, not covered for its disposal and when an application is filed by the accused for its return from subsequent to the compounding of the offence, in view of the order compounding the offence is silent in this regard since there was objection raised by the I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam, for return of the property sought by the accused Nos.1 to 8. It is thereby the present revision is filed for clarification and the learned counsel for the defacto complainant Sri A. Prabhakar Rao represented by Sri G. Ravi states that as it is the amount seized from the accused they have no objection for its return and the accused are entitled to return.

Accordingly and in the result, the criminal revision case is disposed of and the order is clarified and the learned I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam, is directed to pass appropriate orders.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any shall stand closed. No costs.

_____________________________________ JUSTICE Dr. B.SIVA SANKARA RAO Date: 25.04.2017 ska