M/S.Sri Raghava Coneructions Ltd v. Sri Chalasani Vara Prasad

[ 3251 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8351 OF 2019 Between:

'1. M/s.SRl RAGHAVA CONSTRUCTIONS LTD, Having its office at H.No.1-1'1220lA Gurumurthy Lane, Begumpet, Hyderabad, Represented by its Managing Director Sri Anne Venkateswara Rao s/o Anne Purnaian.

2. Anne Venkateswara Rao, S/o.Anne Purnaiah Aged about years, Occ Business, R/o.Flat No.59, Dream Valley, OU Colony, Shaikpet, Hyderabad.

...PETTTTONERS/ACCUSED(S) AND

1. Sri Chalasani Vara Prasad, S/o Anjaneyulu, Aged about 61 Yrs.Occ.Business, R/o.MIG-63, Dharma Reddy Colony Phase-l KPHB Colony, Kukatpally Hyderabad

2. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court Hyderabad Telangana ...RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANTS Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in CC No. 46 of 201 9 on the fie of the Xll Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Kukatpally and pass. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2019 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including the appearance of the petitioners in connection with CC No. 46 of 2019 on the file of the Xll Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Kukatpally and pass.

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Karkpalem Advocate representing Sri NAGESHWARA RAO PAPPU, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.2 and none appeared for the Respondent No.'1 .

The Court made the following: OROER

tE-raal.- THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION No.8351 0F 2019 ORDER:

Mr.Naumene Suraparaj Karlapalem, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the issLtes between the parties have been settled out of the Court and, therefore, the cause in tl-re criminal petition does not survive for adjudication'

I 2.

Recording the said submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any' shall stand closed.

SD/ L.VIJAYA LAXMI ASSISI'ANT REGISTRAR i/TRUE COPY// \ I SF.CTION OFFICER To, '1 . The Xll Additional Metropolitan Magistrate-' Cyberabad at Kukatpally ,. il;'Sio, Police Station, KPHB Colony' Kukatpally Hyderabad - i. i*" CC. i" tne puBr-rc bROSECUTOR, High Court to the State of Telangana, Hyderabad (OUT)

4. o;;';c i;' shr r.rncEsiwnnn nno PAPPU Advocate toPucl

5. Two CD CoPies rpk/eh Vn-

HIGH COURT DATED:0510312025 oF T€r .,t.

'o a .t$ s s'

i l /:"

it v l: l-) l"t.

i;

<." // ,l/ '1rr I t +

ORDER

CRLP.No.8351 of 2019 CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISMISSED ( pq q4 e) @