Edulakanti Rakesh Goud v. Jillamoni Venkatesh

HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI I.A.No.4 of 2019 In/and CRIMINAL PETITION No. 8407 of 2019 ORDER:

1) The petitioners, who are accused in S.C.No.217 of 2014 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge-cum-Assistant Sessions Judge (FTC), Ibrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy District, filed this Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings in the above S.C. A charge sheet came to be filed against the petitioners for the offences punishable under Section 307 read with Section 34 of I.P.C.

2) Along with the Criminal Petition, I.A.No.4 of 2019 came to be filed by the first respondent to record the compromise. Along with the petition, a joint memo which is signed by the parties and their counsel, photographs of the parties and Photostat copies of their Aadhar Cards came to be filed. It is stated in the affidavit that at the intervention of elders and well wishers, the parties have settled their disputes in terms of the compromise. 3) Today, both the parties are present before this Court and they were identified by their respective counsel. This Court, when examined, both the parties have stated that at the instance of the elders, they have settled the matter out of the Court and the first respondent has no objection for quashing the proceedings against the petitioners.

4) A perusal of the material on record would show that though the charge has been framed under Section 307 of I.P.C., but the injuries which are found on the body of the first respondent are simple in nature. Even as per the evidence of P.W.11-the doctor, who examined the first respondent/ injured, the injuries found on the body of the injured are simple in nature and that too not on any of the vital parts of the body. Looking into the nature of injuries and in the light of the compromise arrived at between the parties, the compromise memo filed by both the parties is recorded and I.A.No.4 of 2019 is ordered.

5) Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed in terms of compromise, and the proceedings in S.C.No.217 of 2014 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge-cum-Assistant Sessions Judge (FTC), Ibrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy District, against the petitioners are hereby quashed. However, the petitioners are directed to deposit a sum of Rs.15,000/ - and the first respondent is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.15,000/ - to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, within a period of one week from today.

6) Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shall stand closed. ________________ JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI 03.02.2020 gkv

HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI I.A.No.4 of 2019 In/and CRIMINAL PETITION No. 8407 of 2019 Dated: 03.02.2020 gkv