Chukka Gangareddy, v. The Government Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By Its Secretary,
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. KESHAVA RAO WRIT PETITION No.12938 of 2014 ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3. 2.
The prayer sought in the writ petition is as under:- "...to issue order or orders more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents herein registering the crime as per the complaint dt.27-07-2013 before the Respondent No.1 herein and providing protection to the life and personal liberty to the petitioner herein as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and violation of Article 19 & 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially it is also prayed that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 herein to initiate disciplinary and criminal action against the Respondent No.4 herein for violating and disobeying the law and pass..." 3.
Learned Government Pleader, during the course of hearing, placed on record the written instructions, dated 08.11.2019, issued by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Dharmapuri Police Station, Jagtial District.
4.
From the perusal of the said written instructions, it is revealed that on verification of the station records there is no complaint, more particularly the complaint, dated 27.07.2013, on the file of the Dharmapuri Police Station, Jagtial District, alleged to have been submitted by the petitioner. It is also specifically denied that the
petitioner has given a complaint to the 2nd respondent on 27.07.2013. In fact, the petitioner never approached the 2nd respondent nor given any complaint.
5.
In view of the said facts, this Court is of the opinion that there are no merits in the writ petition and the same is liable to be dismissed.
6.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner is given liberty to file a fresh complaint, if any cause of action still survives enabling him to file a complaint. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand dismissed. No costs.
___________________ P. KESHAVA RAO, J 8th November 2019 mar