Chakkilam Estates And Another v. The State Of Telangana And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTTCE G.RADHA RANt CRIMINAL PETITI ON NO: 12964 OF 2014 Between:

t C.n9{<ila_1.!states, Rep. by its Managing Director C. Raghuram, having it's office at 6-3-649/5, Somajiguda, Hyderabad.

2. 9.Eggltuq, S/o.Venkateshan, aged 38 years, Occ: Managing Director, Rl/o 6-6663/"1 5/A, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2 AND 'l . The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana And for the State of Andhra Pradesh. ....RespondenU Respondent Ranjana Aganrval, W/o Late Prakash AgaMal, A R/o Flat No.23, Sri Niketan Apartments, Road N Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.

z ged 38 years, Occ: Housewife, o.2, Palace Colony, ,..RESPONDENT/COM PLAINANT Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Judgment passed by the XIV Additional Judge-cum-XVlll Additionat Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, in C.C.No.12512008 dated 1'1th Day of February, 2014, without pronouncing the sentence, simply pronouncing the petitioners/accused No.1 and 2 found guilty, in the absence ofthe petitioners/accused No.1 and 2, is bad vitiated and against the provisions of N.l.Act and also against the provisions of Cr.P.C.

relating to passing of the Judgment is liable to be quashed as it is not the "Judgment" at all in the eye of law as nothing is stated or mentioned regarding sentence or punishment in the Judgment, and the same is bad, illegal and against the law, and liable to be quashed CRLPMP. NO: 13486 OF 2014 Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to pending disposal of the quash petition all further proceedings in pursuance of the Judgment passed by the XIV Additional Judge-cum-XVlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, dated, '1 1tn Day of February, 2014, in C.C.No.'

12512008 are liable to be stayed This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri I.VENKATA PRASAD, Advocate for the Petitioners and of the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri Damodar Mundra, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.

V HON,BLE DT.JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI CRIMTNAL PETITION No.12964 oF 2014 ORDER:

Learned Counsel for petitioners submittecl that the accused were convicted in the trial court in c.c.No. r25/2008, dated 19.12.2014 and the appeal filed by them was also dismissed by the first appellate court, and as such this criminar petition has become infructuous.

Recording the said submission, this criminal petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

Sd/.B.SATYAVATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// \ SECTION OFFICER To

1. The XIV Additional Judge -cum- XVlll Additional chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad.

2. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad (OUT)

3. One CC to Sri l.V.Prasad, Advocate (OPUC)

4. One CC to Sri Damodar Mundra, Advocate (OPUC)

5. Two CD Copies

6. One Spare Copy Kj.

HIGH COURT DATED:2611012O21 I gl ArE Or '( I o \t Ns\$s o o v .+^ t DESP

ORDER

CRLP.No.12964 ot 2014 DISMISSING THE CRL,P. AS INFRUCTUOUS.

{1