E.Rajanna v. Telangana Grameena Bank And Another

[ 3304 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 28544 OF 2019 Between:

E.Rajanna, S/o late Sri Ramaiah, aged about 59 years, working as Senior Manager, Telangana Grameena Bank, Chennur Branch, Chennur, Mancherial District.

...PETITIONER AND Telangana Grameena Bank, H.No.2-1 -520, 2nd floor, Vijaya Sri Sai Celstia, Street No.9, Shankarmath Road, Hyderabad, rep. by its Chairman. The Chairman, Telangana Grameena Bank, H.No.2-1 -52O, 2nd floor, Vijaya Sri Sai Celstia, Street No.g, Shankarmath Road, Hyderabad. ..,RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus:

i) Declare the enquiry conducted pursuant to the charge sheet No.Gr.Xll/20't B-1 9/9688, dl.02lO2l2O1S and consequential proceeding No.Gr.Xll/2019- 2016758, dt.O7h2l2019, issued by the 2nd respondent, as illegal and arbitrary and set aside the same. lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned proceeding No.Gr.Xll/2019-2O16758, dt.0711212019, issued by the 2nd respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.VASUDEVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: SRI S.MUJIB KUMAR The Court made the following: ORDER

_) THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVI\RAPU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.28544 of 2OL9 ORDER:

Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner has informed this Court that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and the writ petition has become infructuous 2.

In view of the above submission, the writ petition 1S dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.

SD/-N. SRIHARI ASSISTANT REGISTIAR l I //TRUE COPY// ts/ SECTION OFFICER To, One CC to SRI K.VASUDEVA REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRI S.MUJIB KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies BSR GJP

HIGH COURT DATED: 1610212024 1H[: .j,-,i oB l- {('

o() X 0 nAR ?01/i ,.

(;

9"s,. 1r c. ..' E () \\

ORDER

WP.No.28544 of 2019 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS , j ?_n